(Jerry Oxendine: Private Information Thief or unwilling validator for
N7VCF?)
=A0=A0Gee Jerry, you post something and the rainbow group of hammies go
rapid. Let's see, you and a few others refer themself the "akc", who
biles to N8 (who bows to me). Dogie and Geogre and Frank take to making
up "code" words and terms that exist nowhere except in their dmaged
psyche and low self-esteem. They have failed at all they became involved
in, and somehow latched in to those whose lives they most want to live,
albeit vicariously. They cry out in the night and lay responsiblity to
your posts and claims.

=A0=A0Mr. O, now that your affiliation with such a group is in the open,
you need address a concern or two.
N7VCF claims you would release private information gained from doing
business with private parties merely for the asking. Since those that
must access the group only anonymously look to you for validation and
appear to know you well enough to make such claims about your boorish
and unprofessional behavior without objection from yourself, you really
need examine your behavior, Jerry. It's one thing to surround yourself
with known homosexuals, Jerry, as we don't give a damn what you do in
your personal life. But when someone like you who self-professes to be
the example of a hammie that follows the law, stoops to the lowlife
practice of releasing personal information concerning a private party
you did business with merely for the asking, in order to bolster a known
liar's internet claim and personal angry hateful crusade against all he
is ignorant of (hoo-boy,,and that's infinite,,,,)...at this point, the
public needs informed, as some feel as strongly about your misdeeds and
wrongdoings as you do most cbers. This is much in the manner as your
personal belief you are doing a public service regarding your
self-appointed radio policing, the same can be said for those wishing to
protect the public from your poor decisions regarding their personal
information and your releasing said information for personal use. The
release of private information is a serious matter today, but in all
reality, your behavior comes as no surprise, although it is appalling.


=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Perhaps Frank's post should be a precursive requisite,
made available to all those involved with you via the internet and
anything involving a transaction. They have a right to know your
position regarding their information and your "privacy policy", in
addition to your personal association with such a hammie homosexual
group headed up by N8WWM and on many occcasions, staunchly defended and
supported by Gillinad and other team voob members. The group that refer
to themself as "akc" or "victims" of those like myself who choose to
talk dx on the cb, must remain in the shadows and underground,
Jerry,,never again will you see a renegade hammie such as yourself or
Frank or Leland or Geogre, put their call to your fabled group...It USED
to be that way, but never again,,,they must remain anonymous....that is
my legacy,,,LOL.
Think of it this way, Jerry,,,you said on many occasion you were doing
your part in educating people regarding the law,,,,,well, those that are
not familiar with your antics can be informed of your politics regarding
their private information, and then make an educated decision whether or
not they choose to do business with you.


Oh yea,,,the question...,,,how did Frank, a self-styled and
self-admitted member of the AKC (altough he has been loathe to amke such
posts lately, there exist a ton of them endorsing this hallucinated
"Akc") come to know you well enough that you not only allow him to speak
for you, but tell the world your business practices concerning private
consumer information are less than ethical?

The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong