"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
(Jerry Oxendine: Private Information Thief or unwilling validator for
N7VCF?)
Gee Jerry, you post something and the rainbow group of hammies go
rapid. Let's see, you and a few others refer themself the "akc", who
biles to N8 (who bows to me). Dogie and Geogre and Frank take to making
up "code" words and terms that exist nowhere except in their dmaged
psyche and low self-esteem. They have failed at all they became involved
in, and somehow latched in to those whose lives they most want to live,
albeit vicariously. They cry out in the night and lay responsiblity to
your posts and claims.

Mr. O, now that your affiliation with such a group is in the open,
you need address a concern or two.
N7VCF claims you would release private information gained from doing
business with private parties merely for the asking. Since those that
must access the group only anonymously look to you for validation and
appear to know you well enough to make such claims about your boorish
and unprofessional behavior without objection from yourself, you really
need examine your behavior, Jerry. It's one thing to surround yourself
with known homosexuals, Jerry, as we don't give a damn what you do in
your personal life. But when someone like you who self-professes to be
the example of a hammie that follows the law, stoops to the lowlife
practice of releasing personal information concerning a private party
you did business with merely for the asking, in order to bolster a known
liar's internet claim and personal angry hateful crusade against all he
is ignorant of (hoo-boy,,and that's infinite,,,,)...at this point, the
public needs informed, as some feel as strongly about your misdeeds and
wrongdoings as you do most cbers. This is much in the manner as your
personal belief you are doing a public service regarding your
self-appointed radio policing, the same can be said for those wishing to
protect the public from your poor decisions regarding their personal
information and your releasing said information for personal use. The
release of private information is a serious matter today, but in all
reality, your behavior comes as no surprise, although it is appalling.


Perhaps Frank's post should be a precursive requisite,
made available to all those involved with you via the internet and
anything involving a transaction. They have a right to know your
position regarding their information and your "privacy policy", in
addition to your personal association with such a hammie homosexual
group headed up by N8WWM and on many occcasions, staunchly defended and
supported by Gillinad and other team voob members. The group that refer
to themself as "akc" or "victims" of those like myself who choose to
talk dx on the cb, must remain in the shadows and underground,
Jerry,,never again will you see a renegade hammie such as yourself or
Frank or Leland or Geogre, put their call to your fabled group...It USED
to be that way, but never again,,,they must remain anonymous....that is
my legacy,,,LOL.
Think of it this way, Jerry,,,you said on many occasion you were doing
your part in educating people regarding the law,,,,,well, those that are
not familiar with your antics can be informed of your politics regarding
their private information, and then make an educated decision whether or
not they choose to do business with you.


Oh yea,,,the question...,,,how did Frank, a self-styled and
self-admitted member of the AKC (altough he has been loathe to amke such
posts lately, there exist a ton of them endorsing this hallucinated
"Akc") come to know you well enough that you not only allow him to speak
for you, but tell the world your business practices concerning private
consumer information are less than ethical?

The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong

l. I have no idea what you are talking about.
2. I don't know who N7VCF (I haven't bothered to look it up) is and don't
care.

3. I have no affiliation with AKC.

4. I have not released any "information" concerning the private business of
any person or persons; I don't KNOW the private business of any individual
who posts
to this group and don't CARE to.

5. I HAVE no "business" practices, and am not affiliated with any business.

6. Show where I released info, or in any way made myself affiliated with
AKC. I chided them about their
taking credit for Pacetronics when it originated from the
Dallas Field Office which happens to now be the point
of enforcement of sellers of not-approved radios and amps. That post was
tongue-in-cheek. If someone steals something I posted and takes credit for
it, I can't help it.
Don't jump (ribbet, ribbet) to conclusions. I am NOT part of AKC, nor do I
condone their posts that contain filthy references to homosexuality.

7. I HAVE no business "practices"; I am happily retired and at my leisure.

8 Anything *I* post comes from me or a legimate source and is meant to
inform; I don't engage in flames unless someone tees me off.

9. Can you deny that much of what I have told you has come true during the
last 2 years. Do you remember the
howls of ridicule and denialed that ensued? I KNOW what I was told. AND,
yes, a case is being prepared to
go after the truck stops, and it won't happen until the FCC lawyers are
certain that they will win. Now, even you are falling for the AKC trap
which is to stir miscontent and dissent.

10. I will be the first to tell you that I am not afraid to say what I
believe. I believe the theft of spectrum is just as wrong as stealing beer
at the supermarket. I believe that
licensed frequencies are to be left alone. I believe as long
as the CB operators remain within the 40 channels, it is
not my business--even if they run a gazillion watts. Let 'em have the
superbowl. Let 'em pop their eyes out of their heads for all I care. When
people start stealing---
and intangible things such as frequencies are just as valuable and need
protecting----things from me then I start doing whatever it takes to prevent
it. Would I tell
on a truck driver for talking on 10 Meters? YES!! Let him to go back to
channel 19. Would I rat out a supplier
like Copper that sells "10 Meter" radios? YES!! They
are breaking the law and causing interference to me and
all others who have fulfilled the requirements to use those
frequencies. Come in my yard and steal my lawnmower?
Damn right!! Don't be surprised if you didn't get a load of
rock salt up your a**! Some kids with 4 wheel drives once decided to do
donuts in my front yard leaving ugly ruts. I took a couple of thin boards
and filled them FULL of nails and tacks. Then I buried them in the yard in
their
"favorite" spot they liked to do donuts in. One night the
boards disappeared, so I followed the boys out the road
a piece to find them on the side of the road with a FLAT!
(I found the boards farther back from my house). I am sure it ruined at
least one of their tires. Butcha know what? I have never had ruts cut in my
yard again. Seen 'em, in other yards,, but not in mine. The moral is;
Illegal operators stay OUT of "my" yard! Do that, and you won't hear from
me. I find a trucker (for example) "a-tawkin'" on 10 Meters, his a** is
mine if I hear him.

Whatever AKC has done that has you so mad, whatever it is they did to YOU, I
had nothing to do with it. Don't attribute something THEY did to me: I did
not, and nothing makes me madder than to be accused of something I didn't
do. So you lay out here what *I* did
to you, or said to you, or attributed to you, OR accused you of that proves
I have something to do with AKC.


J (damn it)