View Single Post
  #71   Report Post  
Old February 18th 04, 04:33 PM
Twistedhed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Lancer)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:43:09 -0500 (EST),

(Twistedhed) wrote:
Frank Gillinad wrote:
(And for the record, all high-tech gizmos
designed to compensate for the inductive
reactance of power and transmission lines
during a lightning strike have failed miserably
because lightning has no fixed frequency.)

Frequency has no relation to the success or failure of lightning
protection devices in the manner you implied.
_
Thats true, did he say otherwise?



He did. He said..."


...because lightning has no fixed frequency."



Again, frequency has no relation to the manner in whcih he inferred.



Sorry I missed that





Forget about it and move on. Must be a temporary Texas thing.


The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong