On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 12:31:04 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:
Cecil's poorly offered Light analogies suffering from the same lack.
That's pretty funny, Richard, since you are agreeing with me 100%
in this posting. Glass that allows glare loses some light in the
rearward direction (reflections).
Everything you write about light is pretty funny; your sheer lack of
experience is revealed where you can't name what frequency glare is.
Care to hazard a guess? Or do we get quotes from you suitable for
Thurberian response? :-)
|