Peter Rabbit wrote:
"Oil Leak" wrote in
:

Duke Of Windsor wrote:
"Oil Leak" wrote in
I personally think x-no-archive is lame. But that's just my humble
oppinion.

Why do you think it is lame? it doesnt effect you in any way, and
you would never know it is used unless you are not paranoid and
dont read headers.

x-no-archive is in the body of the document; at least in Outlook
Express. I don't see the headers. My contention is that if you have
something to say, just say it. Finding a way to make sure Google
does not pick it up 7 years from now is not something I care about.
If you decide you didn't like what you had to say, name-shift. But
leave your comments out there for posterity.


Please tell this to Steveo, he has was the first in this NG to do so
and continues to do so, or are you being a hypocrite again?

Steve knows I don't use x-no-archive. We do not have to agree on
everything. That is not the foundation of friendship, DoW. I have
clearly given reason why I do not use x-no-archive; and anyone that wants
to use it is welcome to. I also refuse to vote, but 50% of Americans do.
I hate hockey, but not everyone agrees with that either. And lastly, I am
extremely anti-Islam.

--
_______________________
Harley, Harley; made of Tin.
Ride it out, then push it in.