Frank Gilliland wrote in message . ..
In ,
(Richard Cranium) wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote in message . ..
In , "Road Warrior"
wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:
You are a liar. You already admitted it.
Where? Remember where I said that we would build on your success with
quoting? Well, now's the time. Where do I admit anything of the sort?
Here you go, yellow bellied Naziboi:
Frank Gilliland wrote:
I have admitted lying in this ng, and on
more than one occasion
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Good boy, Race Warrior! You completely avoided the issue
of "fire school", which not only demonstrates your ignorance but is also proof
that Twisty is not only willing to hide the truth when it will expose him as the
pathological liar he is, but that he (as well as yourself) are TOTALLY INCAPABLE
of admitting your lies when the truth is no longer avoidable!
Wrong again, as usual, Frankie. He proved that you have admitted to
being a liar,
He didn't prove anything because I never denied it, "dimbulb"!
Then why did you ask where you ever said that? Of course you were
denying it. Dimbulb!
and that's much more important than your lame question
about semantics.
Lame? Not even. It was VERY important to understand the meaning of the term
"fire school" when the entire foundation of the argument against me rested upon
my lack of understanding of the term. As soon as the "semantics" had been
clarified by my accusers, the argument backfired right in their faces. That's
not lame, Clyde -- that's poetic justice!
Only in your peanut-sized mind. Hardly "VERY important"; it was
nit-picking, the same thing lawyers do, looking for a hairline crack
in the veneer rather than Right or Wrong. And that's LAME, Frankie.
You should spend more time taking care of your failing business than
you spend TROLLing the UseNet picking arguements over stupid things.
Then maybe you wouldn't have to vent your bitterness and sour grapes
here.
Liars have no credibility.
Theoretical question: If someone tells just one lie then nothing they say, or
have ever said, can be believed?
You have admitted lying in this newsgroup more than once. Your
theoretical question is therefore irrelevant.
You have placed yourself
in a special class, accompanied by the alleged Georgie-girl, DouGay
Adair, and the nonexistent Anal Aaron. How exclusive. Congrats!
I don't place myself in -any- class of people, Clyde. But you categorizing me in
with other people that don't like you only supports the "sour grapes" theory of
demoralizing influences in our society.
HAHAHAHAHA! Sidestep all you want, Frankie; you don't have to say
anything, your actions place you in that low class of people. So does
the fact that you participate in their TROLLing.
But I agree: You, DouGay Adair, and "Georgie-girl" are certainly
demoralizing influences in our society.