RadioBanter - View Single Post

May 14th 04, 05:04 PM

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Fri, 14 May 2004 04:13:14 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 13 May 2004 13:45:36 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:
There's a difference with "community" involvement and State involvement.
While I might say something to someone in my town, I will not bother
with some guy on the highway, that would never see me again in a million
years.

So, can I assume then that you have no

alternative answer? Should we just allow

society to regress in much the same manner

as operators on CB radio did?

There's not much you can do about society as a whole.

A single individual cannot make much of a

difference. But if every individual joined with

other like-minded individuals, pretty soon you

develop a force to be reckoned with.

You
can only make your part of society the best you can. Raise the children
with good values and to respect their elders.

A lot of good it does when they are thrust into

a world which does not share those well

taught values.

_
YOUR values are shared by a troubled minority of N8WWM, KC8LDO and
N7VCF, according to your many posts.

When your (and mine) kid has

to hang out with other kids who think it's cool

to be stupid, indifferent, or rebellious (even if

they don't fully understand what they're

rebelling against), all of that good upbringing

goes out the window unless they have a

strong support system.

I can not see the regress of CB as the eminent downfall of society.

One is simply a reflection of the other.

_
Only in your shallow mind.

_
The gradual, but definite, regression of

morality and good character is evident on both
CB and in society as a whole. Having been

involved with CB radio for the better part of

30+ years, I had a front row seat for the show.
How far this "regression" continues remains to
be seen.
_
Meanwhile, you are reactive and not proactive. You do nothing but whine
on an obscure corner of usenet about all that upsets you and you blame
it on others, failing to compehend your reactive (not proactive)
approach is more part the problem.
_

People will scream "Big Brother". But maybe

that's what it takes when you can't trust people
to behave on their own.

To adhere to what *you* an extremist and minority view feels is
acceptable...LOL..perhaps you ought move to a country that shares your
views, because in the US, such bull**** is just that,,,bull****. Stalin
echoed the same words when he said the masses can not be trusted to act
on their own free will without the guidance of his governing hand.

_
Already done, dismissed in the courts. A rental car agency was doing
that, issuing speeding tickets to thier customers, the courts ordered
them to stop.

There's a difference between a rental car

agency and a provision in the law. If the law

were changed, it would be allowed.

non-sequitur,,,"And IF the queen had balls, she'd be king".

Your testimony only proves that the

technology is viable.
_
And yours proves only that you need include "what IFs" becasue you have
no validity.

_
Yes Technology is available, but it won't be used, at least probably not
in our lifetime.

People have the right to privacy so that they

can break laws with a reasonable chance of

getting away with it.

That is the most idiotic thing you have ever said to dat, Herr Hall, but
one for the memory banks. You have some serious issues with freedom and
should move to a country that curbs the freedoms you want taken away.
_
Again, good luck trying in this state. I'm sure
there is some sort of immunity laws that protect the *******s.

You might be right, but if no one wants to try,

we'll never get what we want.

WE? None share your Stalinist views, Davie-son, The only folks you speak
for is N8WWM, KC8LDO, N7VCF and yourself. Your extremist views seeking
to do away with privacy and make everyone conform to your warped views
is as anti-American as one can get.
You're a poor lost soul who dwells on what he can't have and blames
everyone else (IE: society) for your woes.

Sometimes you don't have to take on the top

dog to make a precedent, although you

probably need the right circumstances and the
right visibility.

And your approach is all reactive, something you "lambast" others for,
hence, one more reason for your apt fitting tag "hypocrite".

=A0Dave

"Sandbagger"

"People have the right to privacy so that they can break laws with a
reasonable chance of getting away with it." - N3CVJ Dave "The Hypocrite"
Hall

"It is the citizen's duty to enforce the laws" - N3CVJ Dave "The
Hypocrite" Hall