Thread
:
NY TIMES says new super-small Hammie Antenna defies physics
View Single Post
#
16
June 12th 04, 03:12 PM
John Randall
Posts: n/a
On 11 Jun 2004 18:33:33 -0700,
(I Am Not
George) wrote:
John Randall
wrote:
On 11 Jun 2004 15:26:30 -0700,
(I Am Not
George) wrote:
(Snotgeorge) wrote:
On 11 Jun 2004 13:03:58 -0700,
(I Am Not George) wrote:
no I said a dummy load is very small and will work on 160 as well but
do go on your embarassing yourself tell me how a 46 foot long 160
meter antenna made up of loading coils defies physics Twistednuts
no,that is not what you said. you said
(snip)
got you spinning now humpy, LOL
Why did you snip his post?
to make you break out another alias, humpy. and it worked lol
Alias? Its not an alias, its my real name. Unlike you which prefer
to hide behind an obvious made name. If you are to ignorant to answer
the question, just admit your to ignorant. So nothing worked for you,
except you made yourself look more ignorant.
Please return to your spinning mode.
LOL
Reply With Quote