On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:04:38 -0400,
(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:14:44 -0400, (Nicolai
Carpathia) wrote:
Landshark wrote:
LOL!!! I love it. All I do is type Ditto to "LMAO" and notice Geo calls
ME a hypocrite. He should talk, right BP. He defends Doug a known Felon,
repeater jammer, porn poster, spammer, nut case. Leland defends Doug
too, so George has no legs to stand on when calling other people
hypocrites.
****************Landshark
_
Frank and Hall and both ran to defend N8WWM on many occasions, too. This
little group is what comprises the "akc" that Frank always refers. Hell,
"AKC" is one of Frank's favorite terms,,google THAT term and see who
pioneered it,,,Doug, Frank, Lelnad, Geogre, and Hall..in that order.



I have also NEVER

defended any actions that Doug has been

proven guilty of.



That's only because you claim those reported by the FCC on the
rainreport
do not constitute guilt of which the FCC claims..

You are the one who is quick to point out that a criminal is not a
true criminal until convicted. Yet you seem to conveniently forget
that when the shoe is on the other foot.

Nevertheless,,,here are but a few of your defenses of Dogie. As
pertaining to his bust, taken from "king of clowns busted" and "n8wwm
makes rainreport""

N3CVJ wrote:
" .......the complaint was withdrawn because
there was either insufficient evidence, or it
was
shown that Doug was not the person doing the
jamming."


I was merely offering an alternative explanations.


No,,the complaint was NOT withdrawn, as is standard procedure, Dogie was
sent a warning via certified snail mail, like the majority of other
first time offenders.

And just how would you know what Doug received?


Here's my personal favorite personification fo what makes you the grand
mastah poobah who holds court in the Hypocrite Hall....the one of you
justifying Dogie's illegal actions by pointing to others.......


"Whatever he did, he did because he doesn't
like people like you, who have little respect for
the law.

Taken out of context, in the manner in which you presented it, that
could apply to just about anyone.





Of course, we have the more entertaining, liberal, tear-jerking, choker
you wrote in regards to Doug getting busted.... :



I have a habit of standing up for the little guy,
when a bunch of people gang up on them.
especially when the little guy is right.



Hahaha...no you don't Davie. In fact, you can illustrate NO thread, NO
topic in which you "stood up for the little guy" where a " bunch of
people gang up" on him.

You obviously are incapable of finding them. In the very beginning, I
took a stand against those who ganged up on CBers for no other reason
than they were "different". Later on, when it became apparent that the
tide had shifted, I took the stand to support the rights of legal
operators.



And Dogie was not right, at any time.

Maybe not his methods, but his attitude with respect to illegal CB
operators is pretty much on the mark.

The ONLY people you have ever defended in here have been N8, Lelnad, and
Frank.

When you and other like minded simpletons bring unfounded accusations
and pure unadulterated lies forth and attempt to present them as
truth, then yes, I will defend the honor of those you wish to smear.


In fact, google Dogie's call, along with "sandbagger" and you are right
there in each and every thread, arguing vehemently and acting like
Dogie's arm-chair lawyer

If not an outright lie, it is an extreme exaggeration. I do not
condone some of the things which have happened here that you have
attributed to Doug (Which there is still no solid proof of). The fact
that my name appears in the same thread means nothing. Google Doug's
call and "Twistedhed", and you will see similar results. Does this
mean that you defend Doug too?



But,,,,let's illustrate how close you actually claimed you were to the
situation........you wrote:
"........there are people, that are in the know,
that have filled me in on some of the smaller
details".

Yea so? Since I do not know the intimate details of the situation,
certain people kindly brought me up to speed.



The FCC were the ones "in the know",,,not your mysterious non-existent
"people".

The FCC was one party to one of the issues. But they were not the only
ones involved. There are other people who personally know people
involved with the alleged "jamming" incident. They are in a far better
position to offer insight than guys like you who only know what you
read on the internet.


The complaint came from club members (those "in-the-know").

Now you're catching on.......



And then here is the one where you claim it could be Chuck-eye who was
impersonating Dogie to frame him and the possibility was being
investigated by the FCC.

That's a lie. I don't even know Chuck. Unless it was offered as a
hypothetical speculation in response to something equally
preposterous.


......hehhhehe......ah, never mind,,the post is
there in those threads for all to enjoy,,,,, but don't say you didn't
defend Dogie when he got busted. It's an outright lie.

I haven't defended anyone. I have only offered alternative
explanations for certain events. YOU, of all people, who stand up for
the rights of criminals to be criminals, (until they are convicted!)
to stand here and accuse me of refusing to drive a guilty stake
through the heart of another person (who just happens to be someone
you don't like) before all the facts are in and the courts have ruled.
I guess by this logic then you really ARE a federal criminal.

The sign of a true sociopath. Abandon core principles when it suits
you.

THAT sir, makes you a grade "A" hypocrite.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj