Hello, Twist

Heck, you can find plans on the Internet to make bombs using
fertilizer. Here I have severe problems for weeks whilst changing
ISPs and you come back stirring the pot


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim


(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote in message ...
From: "fs" Group: rec.radio.cb Subject:
LINEAR RF AMP PLANS X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority:
Normal X-Complaints-To: X-Trace:
attbi s03 1090266179 24.0.2.86 (Mon, 19 Jul 2004 19:42:59 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, Jul 19, 2004, 7:42pm (EDT+4)
Organization: Comcast Online Date: Mon, Jul 19, 2004,
7:42pm (EDT+4)
No law against it at all, but those plans suck. Piece of ****

"Nicolai Carpathia" wrote in message
...
From: (arrl)
this info has been forwarded to the FCC.
ham op

Perhaps someone from the FCC will educate and enlighten you. The free
exchange of such information is completely legal and the FCC has no
governing authority over such. High school grads know such things.
-
Just because it's a small amp doesn't mean it sucks. Everyone doesn't
need huge watts to get around the world......I've been a huge proponent
of low power worldwide dx for years.
I hardly think think the FCC would be interested in these plans merely
because your opinion says the amp sucks. Besides, why does it suck? Is
the bias off? What radio did you try this amp with? Did you try and put
the amp together and run into problems? The plans have been implemented
by many operators, which is why they continue to be a popular offering.