Thread: OT ping Jim
View Single Post
  #52   Report Post  
Old September 30th 04, 03:36 PM
Twistedhed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:33:25 -0400,
(Twistedhed)
wrote:
From:
(Dave=A0Hall)
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:10:48 -0400,
(Twistedhed)
wrote:
From:
(Steveo)
Did I ever show you the pic of my Charger winning the burnout contest?
http://img8.exs.cx/my.php?loc=3Dimg8...=3Dmobmain.jpg
_
How did all that white smoke come about with no pavement? Super cool
photo!
_
Speaking of pics, my buddy was here form West Palm (evacuee from Jeanne)
and when the damn storm came here (we are still without electric and I'm
on a generator so I probably won't be around again until the electric
gets turned on) he took some super pics of the palm trees on my property
during the eye-wall. When he gets back home and sends them to me, I'll
post them.
_
Hmmm......


I wonder how one does that with WebTV........


Dave


"Sandbagger"



Simple. One makes a webpage with the photos. You forget my skipfish page
with them yankee boys?


I was not aware of that page

=A0

=A0If you need detailed instructions on how basic webtv operates and
functions, email me.


I'm just curious how you can upload pictures


from a machine which can not handle file


transfers (At least according to the literature


I've read).



Can't upload anything, not sure about what you mean by "file transfers".



The MSN home page claims that you can


create web pages, and mention adding


photos, but gives no further info on how one


actually accomplishes it. My digital camera


uses a USB port to transfer images. The


WebTV console does not advertise a USB


capability.



Perhaps not, but they most certainly have a manner in which to load
pics, but I have an old "classic" set up, the oldest webtv there
is,,,the very first one. The only way I can post a pic is to receive it
from someone else in email and then repost it or publish it on a page,
or else cut and paste a pic, but of course, lifting a pic for any reason
that the user did not take is against federal law governing intellectual
property rights unless explicit written permission was given.


_
In any event, let's clear up something for Mopar and myself. Mopar
should be reminded that the discontent coming from "George" can be only
one of two people....wa3moj, which Landshark has proven beyond
reasonable doubt to the masses, or yourself. Now, before you get crazy,
allow yourself this simple explanation.... you and "Geo" are the ONLY
ones to ever post regarding intimate knowledge of Lancaster (Amish
Country).......example: speaking of the previous ownership of Zinn's on
Route 30.


Let's analyze this statement for a second shall
we? You conclude that the person posting as


"George" has to be either WA3MOJ or me,



I didn't conclude it, I surmised it.


based solely on the basis of our geographical


proximity to Lancaster Pa.?




Not at all,,I based it on you are the only two to have EVER posted here
regarding information f Lancaster.


Are we the only people who live in this area of


Pa? Surely I doubt that.




See above.


Here's another possibility for you to consider.


The person you speak of is neither wa3moj or


anyone else who you know, but rather another
anonymous twit who's been having a huge


laugh at everyone's expense as they accuse


other people of being responsible for the


deeds.







And the only way you know this for absolutely sure and without any doubt
whatsoever, is you are either that person, or heavily involved with the
harassment. I surmise both.



But the big question, that I want to know, is


why bring this up in the middle of a discussion


about the capabilities of WebTV?




Because you reminded me of your trouble making ways and double talk by
posting and asking me things before you answer the questions posed to
you.


You always accuse other people of an inability
to stay focussed on topic.




Exactly,,,like our last exchange concerning your involuntary feelings of
need to meet "Twistedhed".


This left field blurb is a clear deflection from


the topic at hand, if I ever saw it.





Since you don't see things the way the majority of the world does, it is
of little concern.


_
=A0=A0My other piece of enjoyed entertainment at the moment is you
appear to have lost your zest for the quest of meeting up with myself.
After expressing your dire want to meet many times on this group and
mentioning your trip to Disney, I offered you several avenues in which
to achieve your quest, the last of which you failed to respond.
_
One minor correction, I am not of a "dire want"
to meet you.




Double-talk again. You went out of your way and became so enthralled in
your frustration over this, you posted a direct threat that you would
"spread my personal info around".
that's some serious self-contradictio you're doing again.


I will just be in the general area next month,


and gave you the opportunity to prove once


and for all that you are someone beyond your


little cartoon character facade.





How privileged I am to be graced with the chance to "prove" something to
you. If you mattered in the context of anything, I might be interested
in what you do or do not believe, but alas, you do not, and I am
perfectly content watching you self-frustrate over my cartoon character
that drives your misguided quest.




You offered me the choice of either finding


you on the CB, which of course, I don't know


what you go by or what channels you talk on,


which then gives you a convenient excuse to


say that you weren't around when I came


looking. Or giving you MY cell phone number


(Which I don't have), where again there is no


guarantee that you'd call and you now would


theoretically have a piece of my personal


information.





Only YOU are the one making threats with personal information, not I.
What a case of classic self-projection,,,,merely because you would stoop
and lower yourself to harassing another via the "spreading of their
private information" doesn't mean others would do it. In fact, the
majority of regs here are not like you at all. Only a few scumbags are
interested in harassment as you threatened.


That would involve a level of trust that I quite


frankly do not have as of yet.



Seems like you have yourself another quandry.


_
I will
assume you were having fun and blowing smoke not expecting to actually
be given several real-life opportunities to fulfill your curiosity and
respond in kind. Behave yourself.


Now, if you would just direct me to a place


where I could find you, at a specific time, then


I could make the meeting.




Sure,,your hotel. In this manner, you have no personal information of
mine (my work, my plae of business), and I none of yours


You have a charter boat business. I would


think that would be an excellent opportunity.





Deal. Send me your credit card information for a full day excursion. I
will give you ten percent professional discount and I accept Triple A,
in addittion to AARP discounts. In the fall (now), I have a strict
cancelation fee because of the crowds. A reservation fee of $100.00 is
imposed on your card, but applied toward the remainder of the balance
when your trip is complete.
DO NOT book this trip unless you want your card charged.



Dave


"Sandbagger"


http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj