RadioBanter - View Single Post - Newbie CB User has ?'s Please someone advise

October 6th 04, 05:03 PM

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:04:33 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:34:23 GMT, sideband wrote:
Twistedhed wrote:
You would be best served putting your voodoo radio bull**** to rest.
Assuming a peak and tune job is somehow related to increased "S" units
is imbecilic.
_
(Twist:
Actually, there is a correlation.)

He knows that. He just likes to insult me.

Nothing insultive was said to you in the above post.

Really? It's when someone even remotely

suggests you're off the mark of "getting

personal you don't seem to apply the

same consideration when you refer to advice

as "voodoo bull****".

I invoke your defense,,,,"If the shoe fits...."

But

he's way out of his element and way too far

into mine if he wants to talk about radio

theory.

Hehe,,,,that's the davie we're all used to, the one that needs to blow
his own horn.

If the shoe fits.

But it doesn't. You were asked to provide for your unsolicited bolster
that you "made the Davemade spectrally pure". Still waiting for you to
tell the masses how you did it, but you won't because you never did it,
you lied about it, just as you lie about everything in your world

In all likelihood, I've probably forgotten more

about the technical aspects of radio than

know know.
=A0
And still manage each and every day to illustrate you know less about
proper communication(s) skills and radio law than most cbers in this
forum. Hell, than most cbers I know.
_
=A0It ilustrates your blown self-esteem. I guess if I was as ignorant as
your remarks about FCC law that hold roger beeps illegal and dxing as a
felony,

Deny all you want.

You were the only one here denying roger beeps were legal and that dx
wasn't a felonious act, Davie, not I, not anyone else,,,,,only *you*.

DXing IS illegal,

Never was contested. What was contested and shot full of holes, was your
ignorant claim that those who talked dx were by virtue, a felon.
You were taught the merits on what you were attempting to discuss (dx
and laws pertaining to) was a civil matter, not criminal. You were
further instructed to email Phil Kane and ask him, since you were loathe
to believe me for personal reasons affecting your emotion that prevent
objectivity on your behalf. You obviously ****ed yourself off by placing
yourself in position to being forced to be educated once again by a
lowly cber. This is reflected upon your subtle cries of deflection
"well, it USED to be illegal" concerning the roger beeps, which you
still have yet to show or (yawn) provide for.

=A0=A0and roger beeps were at one time

considered in the same vein as other

noisemakers as

devices to amuse or entertain.

An still doesn't excuse your ignorance..ignorance of the law is no
excuse. You said they *were* illegal, not that they *used* to be
illegal. Twice you were wrong, twice you can't even bring yourself to
admit it, which is why I had to reiterate it and make you repeat
yourself and clarify in your own underhanded manner, that you now
comprehend dxing is not a felony and roger beeps are not illegal. You're
welcome.

I would hurry up and start tooting my own horn
about another area of which I have slightly

more knowledge than that of the law which

governs "your" element.

I guess you would, but then again you were so blatantly wrong twice in a
row, no one blames you for not starting to "toot your own horn about
another area" in which you claim knowledge.

I understand the law well enough.

Making claims that cbers talking dx makes them felons is about as far as
one can get from understanding the law, but you go on and continue to
espouse your ignorance and continue to believe you were successful in
passing it off as intelligence.

At least I'm

not blatantly disregarding it.

You can't even understand, comprehend, or define the law, so there is no
way at all you can claim you aren't disregarding it. Since you are
blatantly ignorant of the law, you can not comprehend when you blatantly
violate it.
More for your education today.....regardless of your repeated failed
attempts to portray myself as such, I don't blatantly disrespect the dx
law, Dither-Davie, I selectively disregard it. But since you are unable
to differentiate between civil and criminal, what constitutes each,
maintain
you are a psychiatrist and doctor of jurisprudence, claim that dxing is
a felony, and that one is a criminal without being convicted by a court
of law, one could not expect you to comprehend something as simple as
the difference between the two adverbs "blatantly" and "selectively"
_
Nevertheless, tuning a 4 watt radio will not affect any "S" unit on the
receiving end. You go on and believe it will and continue to sling your
voodoo bull**** that is found in your posts from your claim of making a
Davemade "spectrally pure" (something which you are unable to define,
but claim you did) to your bull**** about increased S units from a 4
watt radio.

Are you THAT literal?

Not at all, you're THAT off-topic and reaching for anything but the
topic which was being discussed in the thread to which I replied,,,,, .a
4 watt radio.

Are you disputing my

claim because you're hung up on the absolute

definition of a "4 watt radio"?

That was what was being discussed. Go on and reach for something else,
now,

The term "4 watt

radio" in this context, refers to a stock (legal)

CB.

As was being discussed.

If you peak the radio, of course it will no longer
put out 4 watts, otherwise why do it?

Lowering the deadkey to 3 watts.
I said a peak and tune on this radio will not result in a net change
(increase of S units) and you began menstruating....again.
Peaking and tuning are not synonymous, yet
you have voodoo'd them into a merger on many occasion.

The truth is (a truth that you're either too

anally specific about or unable to

comprehend) that if you double your transmit

power, you increase your signal by 3db.

You are unable to follow the thread, as usual, Davie. The radio in
question was a stock radio. I don't care how much peaking you do, you
aren't going to raise an S unit on a 4 watt radio,and THAT was the claim
I made, regarding the radio being discussed.

A typical "S" meter is "calibrated" in 6db

increments. Therefore, assuming a linear (no

not the amplifier) scale, an increase of 6 db (1

"S" unit) is the equivalent of taking a 4 watt

carrier, and increasing it to 16 watts.

Something that is not possible from a simple

"peak job".

And you danced around it until just now. Let's see my comment that has
you running all amok....."You would be best served putting your voodoo
radio bull**** to rest. Assuming a peak and tune job is somehow related
to increased "S" units is imbecilic."
Appears you are the one all "anally specific" (to use your term). I
guess I SHOULD have been specific when speaking to you, but I wasn't.
Here it is again, and this time, it's "anally-specific" and tailored to
YOUR anal specifications. See if you can tell the difference, then tell
me again how I was too specific the first time I posted it...

"You would be best seved putting your voodoo radio bull**** to rest.
Assuming a peak and tune job is somehow related to increased "S" units
ON THIS 4 WATT RADIO WE ARE SPEAKING OF is imbecilic."

There's nothing "voodoo" about it. But don't

take my word for it. Check out some books on

radio propagation, and read it for yourself.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

Once again, intently satiated am I.