From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 12:03:41 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
I invoke your defense,,,,"If the shoe fits...."

You can't even be original.


Originality doesn't equate validity, but then again, in your world, one
sees how you are unable to comprehend such simple concepts. You claim
civil infractions equals federal, felonious crimes, and that one is a
criminal for the mere act of speaking about something you know nothing
of (dx and law pertaining thereof) in the first place.

_
You were asked to provide for your unsolicited bolster that you "made
the Davemade spectrally pure". Still waiting for you to tell the masses
how you did it, but you won't because you never did it, you lied about
it, just as you lie about everything in your world

I provided the information.

Translation: I am unable.


I'm sorry if the information was too general for

you.



You're only sorry you were caught in so many lies.


Technical details would 've gone over

your head.


Once again, what you post is dictated by and originates with myself.


And for the record, I never said that the amp

was "spectrally pure".

I stated that the amp was now within FCC

emissions specs for use in the H.F. Ham radio
bands.


Hehehe,,your record is chock full of lies.


DXing IS illegal,

Never was contested. What was contested and shot full of holes, was your
ignorant claim that those who talked dx were by virtue, a felon.

They are criminal.


You said felon, in addition to criminal,

As soon as you get it through you thick head

that someone who engages in breaking a law,

whether you want to call it criminal or civil,

especially one which provides jail time, is

considered a criminal.



You speak in absolutes that invalidate everything you ever said. Talking
dx does NOT provide jail time. Of course, you always have the option of
providing for a single case that supports your bull****.


Whether they are caught or ultimately

convicted is only a smoke screen for those

who try to justify their behavior.



Sort of like you are struggling with by attempting but failing to
distant yourself from the incompetent "felon" remarks you have
incorrectly made.



I forgot more than you will ever know

An still doesn't excuse your ignorance..ignorance of the law is no
excuse. You said they *were* illegal, not that they *used* to be
illegal.

I have seen no revised documentation which

clarifies that a roger beep is now an

acceptable device.



Only because you're an incompetent who wrongly believes they were
illegal in the first place. Try this,,,present anything (other than your
charming but uneducated claims) that the FCC held or holds a roger beep
as illegal,,,at any time. Of course, this is the end of the road for
you concerning this thread, as you provide for nothing,,,,,ever.



I would hurry up and start tooting my own horn
about another area of which I have slightly

more knowledge than that of the law which

governs "your" element.


I guess you would, but then again you were so blatantly wrong twice in a
row, no one blames you for not starting to "toot your own horn about
another area" in which you claim knowledge.

Do you always answer yourself?


You posted it, not I.

You do realize that you're commenting on your
own statement.


Apparently that statement was so effective the first time in
illustrating your incompetence, you borrowed it for originalities sake.
Nevertheless, you presented it and directed to myself.

Please try to pay attention.....

Please try and get your communicative skills together. Regardless who
coined the words you present, other than homage to myself, you failing
to comprehend the simplest mannerisms of proper communication.
Nevertheless, tuning a 4 watt radio will not affect any "S" unit on the
receiving end. You go on and believe it will and continue to sling your
voodoo bull**** that is found in your posts from your claim of making a
Davemade "spectrally pure" (something which you are unable to define,
but claim you did) to your bull**** about increased S units from a 4
watt radio.

You are completely off the rails.


And you're bleeding from the gums and on the ropes,


Why else would you tune a radio's transmitter,
other than to either increase or decrease the

power?


Dither dither dither, davie. Try and stay focused, one of your
incompetencies at a time.
I said your peak and tune won't affect your S units on the 4 watt radio
of which you were portraying your ignorance.


If you do, then you will affect your signal on

the receive end.


Not by an S unit you won't.

Are you THAT literal?

Not at all, you're THAT off-topic and reaching for anything but the
topic which was being discussed in the thread to which I replied,,,,, .a
4 watt radio.

No, the topic was whether or not a peak job

was worth the money.



A peak job on what? A 4 watt radio, of course.


Are you disputing my

claim because you're hung up on the absolute

definition of a "4 watt radio"?

The term "4 watt

radio" in this context, refers to a stock (legal)

CB.

As was being discussed.

If you peak the radio, of course it will no longer
put out 4 watts, otherwise why do it?

Lowering the deadkey to 3 watts.

Ok, let's run with that. Are you saying that

lowering the power to 3 watts will not have any
difference on your signal?


Only you seem to be having problems with what I said. In the first
manner, you had to be taught (once again) the answer as to why one would
"otherwise do it" (peak and tune) because your one track mind can only
process one idea at a time. The fact that you had to ASK what else could
be done, in realization, shows you were unable to grasp the "lowering
the deadkey" reason. Now that you were educated better, you are taking
it and "running" with it.
Once again,,,,
I said a peak and tune on this radio will not result in a net change
(increase of S units) and you began menstruating....again.

It certainly will.

Again, this is your incompetence and voodoo bull****. Educate yourself,
oh self-annointed radio cop, psychiatrist, doctor of jurisprudence, and
self-elevated-and-referred-radio-tech.


People are duped into

believing that a peak job will make them "put

out better".

How else do you put out a better signal

without increasing the power?



Please explain to the world, absent of personal insult (if you can
manage such competencies) how peaking a 4 watt cb will increase the S
unit as you claim.


My point, of course, is



Obfuscation of your bull****, of course.

that the amount of power increase available

from a peak job, is not significant enough to

make it worth what "screwdriver technicians"

charge.

Peaking and tuning are not synonymous, yet you have voodoo'd them into a
merger on many occasion.

Why else would you "tune" a radio if not to

alter the power output? Please stop grasping

at straws and enjoy the shoe leather you're

munching on.



The phenomenon you are experiencing is akin to psychosis-induced
stigmata. You worship something so intensely, you believe you are
experiencing what you mistakenly believe your object of desire and
admiration feels.


A typical "S" meter is "calibrated" in 6db

increments. Therefore, assuming a linear (no

not the amplifier) scale, an increase of 6 db (1

"S" unit) is the equivalent of taking a 4 watt

carrier, and increasing it to 16 watts.

Something that is not possible from a simple

"peak job".

And you danced around it until just now. Let's see my comment that has
you running all amok....."You would be best served putting your voodoo
radio bull**** to rest. Assuming a peak and tune job is somehow related
to increased "S" units is imbecilic."

Why else would you peak a radio?


After watching you post regarding such peaks, I'm certain the world
would like to know exactly what you did to all those cb radios to
increase those S units. In fact, "spectrally pure" WERE your words
regarding the Davemade. I suggest you review your incompetencies prior
to denying them.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

Once again, intently satiated am I.

Sedated more likely.....

If it soothes your ego.