View Single Post
  #16   Report Post  
Old October 10th 04, 05:15 PM
Landshark
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"M-Tech" wrote in message
...
Look, no offense, the only thing that's been "discredited" in this group
in the last 2 months (since I've been here anyway)is the fact that the
hams (or those professed to be so) are a bunch of whining azzholes. Some,
including yourself, add MUCH needed tech/help. But MOST hams are only
here for ONE purpose, to disrupt the group.....

Legal or illegal makes no difference to me.....since the group *is*
rec.radio.cb. Not legal.cb/illegal.cb or HAM. It's also NOT up to the
group to determine what's legal/illegal imho. We already have a FCC to do
this. Geez, the population of the cb'er is so damn small I can't believe
hams actually waste their time bitching about it. Back in the 70's-80's,
that was a different story.

I'd rather read "illegal" cb crap than the disgusting remarks made by
alledged hams. I condone neither....but the latter has NOTHING to do with
"cb".

There is NO excuse for operating ANYTHING illegally...there's also NO
excuse for a ham to come to a "cb group" and state the obvious....other
than the fact that the ones who do, are bigger keyclowns than the ones
they profess to police. Just look at the damned posts???? Disgusting
representation of hams I'd say.

Don



Actually it has nothing at all to do with Ham vs CB'r, it's
just a plain out right troll problem.

Landshark


--
My bad..the camera is mightier than the blowhard(s)..in most respects.