View Single Post
  #80   Report Post  
Old October 12th 04, 05:17 PM
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:30:50 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :

From:
(Frank*Gilliland)
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:54:05 -0400,
(Twistedhed)
wrote in :
Frank Gilliland wrote:
And the character "George" was obviously the
result of a troll meant to taunt Twist because
of his staunch anti-Bush position -- George
Bush/George Busch -- get it?
_
That's bull****, Frank. N0BK identified George and said he was an insane
troll long before "Geo" and I ever crossd paths. In fact, Clinton was
still in office.

The first occurance of the callsign WA3MOJ


was late in 2001,



Which is irrelevant to his being present and accounted for agitating in
this group.



But it -is- relevant to his alleged identification as "George Busch".


Of course, you can go ahead and lobby for his innocence at
this point...



Why would I do that?


but you were whining about


GWB almost two years before that -- almost a


full year prior to the election.



Yes, I was complaining about GW before the election,,and it turns out I
was correct in everything I was "whining" about, especially his
predicted failure with foreign policies and ,,,,,,,so much more.



You are indeed batting a pretty high percentage.


Nevertheless, it doesn't negate Gee-ogre's presence prior to his call
being outed.



Probably because it wasn't intended to do so.


And Phil Covington was the first to note the


post with the callsign, not Dick.



I never said Dick was first. I said Dick outed him as insane. Also, as
you note, Phil may have been first to note the post with the call sign,
but that was long after he had been posting here for some time.

Dick later "identified" WA3MOJ as Aaron


Voobner (yes, Dick was occasionally wrong).



Actually, several of you who identified yourselves as AKC and "friends
of legal radio" played a hand in your mythical voobner, but only a few
of you care enough to resurrect him.



.....and your point is....?


To be fair, I didn't like GWB either. But I


shudder to think of what might have happened
if Gore was in office during 9/11.



That's easy. Chances are, we wouldn't have been hit. After all, I don't
believe for a single second that GW's "terrists" (sic) would have been
beheading innocent Americans while videotaping it the entire time and
addressing it to "Gore" like they do Bush.



Classic "what if" scenario.


I have no doubt that Bush is a bigger crook


than Nixon could have ever hoped to be, but


Gore's elevator was completely out of order.



I don't believe we would have been attacked in such a manner. Yes, I
know the planning went on for years, but believe execution was done in
direct response to Bush policies and extensive and involved business
dealings with the Saudis. After all, they are alleged to have over 800
Billion invested in the Bush Amerika.



The US double-dealing foreign policies that ignite such hatred against
America are the result of decades upon decades of manipulation by big
business, and each administration has made their own contributions to
those policies for the past 100+ years. This storm has been building
for quite some time. Bush may have seeded the clouds, but I believe
that the attack was unavoidable, whether it was to come as it did on
9/11, or in another form by some other disgruntled madman.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---