Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 28 Oct 2004 04:17:43 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 28 Oct 2004 03:34:35 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

snip
www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected.

I don't vote for someone based on their chances to win. What good is
that? What message are you sending? That you are content with the
lesser of two evils? You should vote for whoever you think will do the
best job.

We could write in people too. Maybe Ross Perot or Captain Kangaroo, that
won't change reality much tho, now will it?

You bet it will! Wouldn't it be great to see more podiums during the
presidential debates?

Hey, at least you and I vote, I wish more people would.

I hate to see people voting just for the sake of voting. As we've
learned with GWB, we need to make our decisions very carefully. Not
everyone does. Maybe voting should be left to those that are willing
to take responsibility for their decisions......

Maybe in a vacuum, but in reality less than half of our eligible population
actually exercise their right. They do restrict felons and such from
voting, but I doubt they'd make a difference.

Everyone should vote or stfu if you didn't.