On 28 Oct 2004 04:17:43 GMT, Steveo
wrote:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 28 Oct 2004 03:34:35 GMT, Steveo
wrote in :

snip
www.votenader.org

He may not crack the loudest whip in the lion's cage, but he's the
only one that can give a direct answer to a direct question.

True enough but he has as much chance as you or I getting elected.

I don't vote for someone based on their chances to win. What good is
that? What message are you sending? That you are content with the
lesser of two evils? You should vote for whoever you think will do the
best job.

We could write in people too. Maybe Ross Perot or Captain Kangaroo, that
won't change reality much tho, now will it?

Hey, at least you and I vote, I wish more people would.


I disagree. There are way too many people in this country, who can't
even name their congresspeople, or even the name of the vice
president. People who have no idea how government works, or that have
little to no depth of knowledge of the issues at hand, should refrain
from voting. It's way too much responsibility for someone who is
clueless.

I don't want another president (or vice president) who is elected
because they have "nice hair"......

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj