View Single Post
  #44   Report Post  
Old November 10th 04, 01:47 PM
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:57:50 -0500, "Dr.X" wrote:

"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
From: (Dr.X)
"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
Did this work? Do this again, Dr. X,,,I'd like to get on and say hello
to my friends up north. Let me know a day or so in advance.

It worked very well. I want to tweak it a little


though. I don't know how many listeners it


takes to bring it down. It was set at a high


quality so I can picture serious lag if a lot of


people connect. I'll lower it a little and see if I


can get several people to log on at once. This


will give us a better picture of quality vs.


number of simultaneous connections. I'll let


you know when. I'm sure we'll be doing more


testing tonight and over the next few days if


we have time.


-Dr.X



Let me know..I want to wave a hand.


We'll be doing some testing tonight at 7 to see if low bit rates will still
sound good. I'll post the link here when ready. We'll probably be doing
again tmrw night too.


You can probably get away with low sampling rates if you bandwidth
limit the hi frequency end to cut off at 4 Khz, and that way you can
use 8khz as the sampling rate (Niequest theorem 2x audio rate).
16bps is also satisfactory as a bit rate with these low fidelity audio
chips.

That's what I do with my voice grade recordings. It reduces file size
(and streaming bandwidth) considerably.

Dave
"Sandbagger"