Thread
:
Pilot Travel Centers Fined $125,000!
View Single Post
#
30
November 24th 04, 04:00 PM
Twistedhed
Posts: n/a
From:
(Leland=A0C.=A0Scott)
"harvey" wrote in message
.. .
"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...
|
| "Twistedhed" wrote in message |
... | The large
corporations continue to do business as usual while the feds pacify
insignificants with smoke and mirrors (fines).
Except when the "go to jail" part of the penalty
comes up for repeated | violations. Also don't
overlook that some of those Pilot Travel
centers may
be wholly own franchises where the owner
has to pay the fine if they get | busted. The
real fine is having to go to court to fight the
FCC, and that sounds like what may happen.
When it does it could cost them much more
than
the $125K fine depending on how far they
want to take the fight up the legal
ladder. This would be the case to watch.
=A0--
Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO
(i think a company whose one branch makes over 5 billion a yr will just
shrug this off....
harv )
_
For a large company yeah you're right. But
then again if one of the executives ends up in
jail, which they can, then taking the radios off
the shelf would have looked like the smart
thing to do and then just shrug it off.
But you MUST consider the probability factor. What you propose is
deviation from the norm concerning the FCC. You have a better chance of
hitting the lotto. Not going to happen. You are discounting the monetary
factor, here. I believe you are missing the monetary picture here of why
the huge companies stay in business year after year when only the
littles ones are closed and put out of business.
Lately the government likes throwing white
collar company executives in jail for wrong
doing.
Cite a single case involving the FCC tossing a white collar exec in jail
for a similar charge.
After all just how much money are they going
to realistically loose anyway from dumping the
questionable radios from their sales line up?
Nothing, 'cause the radios aren't being dumped.
Not much is my guess. If the FCC chooses to
play hard-ball I expect they will just do what
the FCC told them to do, and not waste any
more time or money on something that won't
materially affect their bottom line.
Your position is based upon suppositions, the "if" factor, and the
assumption the FCC is changing the manner in whcih they operate, as
opposed to reality,,..business-as-usual within the FCC and minimal
enforcement. In fact, Riley has written the FCC considers many of these
complainants a pain-in-the-ass..he didn't come out and say those exact
words, but DID say these type hammies (Oxendine) are often worse than
the offenders themselves. An incredible statement from the head
enforcement officer at the FCC.
--
Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO
Wireless Network
Mobile computing
on the go brought
to you by Micro$oft
Reply With Quote