"Landshark" wrote in message
. com...

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...
You and Frank need to do some more reading. The appeal court process is
there too, but both of you like to conveniently ignore it. As far as the
regulations go, that they are only "rules", go tell that to an
attorney
and watch him laugh at you. Better yet get a NAL yourself and tell that
wopper to the judge.


You don't comprehend it do you?

I understand it just fine.

You can not contest a
NAL in a court of law, you have to contest it before the FCC.

http://www.fcc.gov/oalj/
http://newmedia.cityu.edu.hk/cyberla...dminlaw03.html
http://www.ku.edu/~kulaw/library/admin_res.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Before the
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554


In the Matter of Application of
RICHARD A. BURTON
For General Mobile Radio Service License
)
)
)
)
)



FCC File No. 0000920745
Docket No. 03-188




HEARING DESIGNATION ORDER


Adopted: August 6, 2003 Released: August 7, 2003


By the Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau:


INTRODUCTION
1. By this Hearing Designation Order, we commence a hearing before an FCC
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to determine whether the captioned
application by Richard A. Burton (Burton) for a new General Mobile Radio
Service (GMRS) license should be granted. As discussed below, Burton has
been convicted on four separate occasions for the unlicensed operation of a
radio transmission apparatus in violation of Sections 301 or 318 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Act).[1] In addition, Burton had his
amateur radio license revoked in 1981 for willful and repeated violation of
the Commission's regulations governing the Amateur Radio Service.[2] In
1992, his application for new amateur radio station and operator licenses
was designated for hearing based on character qualifications issues arising
from the 1981 license revocation and the first two of his four felony
convictions[3] for unlicensed radio operations.[4] Based on the information
before us, we believe that Burton's history of repeated violations of the
Act and our Rules raises a substantial and material question of fact as to
whether he possesses the requisite character qualifications to be a
Commission licensee. Because we are unable to make a determination on the
record currently before us that grant of Burton's application for a new GMRS
license would serve the public interest, convenience, and necessity, we
hereby designate the application for hearing, as required by Section 309(e)
of the Act.[5]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------

http://www.nlgcdc.org/briefs/microra...sition_pi.html

http://www.cultureandfamily.org/arti...yi d=cfreport


--
Leland C. Scott
KC8LDO

Wireless Network
Mobile computing
on the go brought
to you by Micro$oft