Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:10:52 -0500, "JAMES HAMPTON"
wrote in
:

Hello, gang

Now that one Supreme Court justice is stating something to the
effect that separation of Church and State is not totally possible
(he is part of the Bush agenda) ... and now that the U.S. Parks
system is being sued for not carrying a book that states that the
Grand Canyon cannot be more than 4,000 years old, I have a couple of
questions regarding marriage and other musings.

1). Since Adam and Eve started this, where did the 3rd generation
come from? Um ... does this mean we can marry one of our parents or
a brother or sister?


No, but it -does- mean that we are all the products of inbreeding.


2). Which religious organization is to rule us? Will it be the
Mormons? Does this mean that polygamy will once again be legal? Or
perhaps the Catholics, since they are not happy with divorce or
abortion.


Well, if the Catholics ruled we wouldn't need prisons -- the sentence
for a crime would be to play with some beads, bark a few hail-mary's,
then get released back onto the streets. But election 2004 suggests
that the ruling religion would likely be a faction of conservative,
bible-thumping, holier-than-thou WASPs. Forget any ideas of 'ethnic
cleansing' or 'gay bashing', this is the 21st Century: can you say
"Moral Makeover"?


3). How much will religion play in our new found country? Will we
be *extremely* religious, such as Iran and most of the Middle East?
Say, I never thought ... perhaps the Muslims should rule (go back to
question 2) or, then again, the Jewish (refer again to question 2).


"Religion is the opium of the masses". And judging by the huge numbers
of people in this country who have some sort of drug dependency (both
prescription -and- illicit drugs), religion may be forced to share the
power with the drug dealers and pharmaceutical corporations.

I was called a pinko-commie-fag the last time I trotted out a Marx quote.
Perhaps I should have stuck with Engals? ;-)

Jeff




4). Will any other religions be permitted?


Sure, just like they were during the Spanish Inquisition.


5). Now that we will have a *very* religious country (the fact that
pi is now equal to three, exactly, will not matter - we've sent
manufacturing to China and outsourced IT to India. I'm sure we can
find someone else to do our engineering),


Isn't it ironic how an irrational number can foster irrational ideas?


how do we fit in with the nuclear powers (Israel, Russia,
North Korea, England, and soon to be nuclear powers - religious
organizations such as Iran. Oh, I forgot the Hindus. Better add
India.)? Could this partially be behind Russia's desire to build up
their nuclear arsenal to be the most powerful in the world? I
remember someone in the paper blaming it on the missile defense
system of the U.S. which was caused by the Democrats. LOL - my
error; here I thought "Star Wars" was Ronald Ray-Guns idea.


Which one was it.... "Beneath the Planet of the Apes"? Where the
mutants worshipped the doomsday bomb?


Suddenly, this makes the question of linear (or non-linear)
amplifiers pretty trivial, in my mind )


What "question"? If you use a linear in the name of God then it will
be legal, of course! Remember how Pride tried to 'excuse' their amps
from the law by claiming they were made by the handicapped? Heck, I'm
suprised someone hasn't tried to market a line of "Patriot Amps"......






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the
World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total
Privacy via Encryption =---

--
---

"Every time I hear the news
That old feeling comes back on;
We're waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the Big Fool says to push on."

- Pete Seeger, 1967
---