Lenof21 wrote:
In article .com,
writes:
Of course it's also possible that Len has gotten so desperate for
attention that he's intentionally posting untrue things (like the
legality of operating with an expired license mistake) just to get a
response.
"Desperately?!?"
Umm, no. "desperate"
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHEHEHEHEHEHEH.
Excuse me, yer lordship, lost control there... Bwhaha...oops.
After all, how does it affect *him* if some ham reads his
words, thinks they're true, and operates illegally?
HAMS rule amateur radio.
FCC doesn't require commissioners or staff to hold amateur radio
licenses in order to regulate U.S. amateur radio.
Ergo, J.P. logic has it that NO HAM SHOULD OBEY THE FCC
IF THEY DON'T HAVE HAM LICENSES!
?!?!?
Poop Dave the 1st would claim the FCC isn't "motivated."
The Coslonaut (heading for outer space) only wants to talk
about socks. Is he really a sock-tucker?
The Avenging Angle keeps nurturing his murderous hatred.
The University Lecturer wants to talk about highways.
That part wasn't too bad, I got a chuckle out of it.
This newsgroup be gettin' FUN-EEEE! :-)
We cudden't do it witout ya! 8^)
Too bad the PCTA extras aren't talking about amateur radio
or the morse code test issue.
Start a thread about the Morse code issue.
Personally, I don't have anywhere near as high an interest in Morse code
as you do.