Thread: FCC STATS
View Single Post
  #15   Report Post  
Old January 6th 05, 12:19 AM
U Know Who
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge"
wrote in message ...
"U Know Who" wrote
in :


"itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge"
wrote in message
...
"U Know Who"
wrote in news

"Psychiatrist to keyclowns" wrote in
message ups.com...

Twistedhed meweled like the sissy boy he is:
Damn,,,,,three convictions for AM/SW users out of the entire year.
It appears despite the noise and bull**** placed forth by n8wwm
and
k4kwh,
enforcement action against cbers is not only down, but on a
continual decline.


-


2004 Enforcement Action Database Index
Total Enforcement Actions: 55
Raids: 11
Visits: 17
Arrests/Convictions/Sentencings/Collections: 2
Postal Contacts: 2
Seizures: 6
NALs: 7 for $80,000
Fines: 16 for $155,000
Unknown Actions: 1
Avg. Fine per Action: $2,818
Avg. Wattage per Action*: 39 watts
Avg. Time on Air*: 13 months
* - not statistically reliable due to unknowns
Active States:
Florida (20)Maine (1)California (9)Montana (1)New Jersey
(7)Oklahoma (1)Colorado (4)Oregon (1)New York (3)Vermont
(1)Pennsylvania (2)Washington (1)Tennessee (2)West Virginia
(1)Illinois (1) By Month:
January - 8
February - 5
March - 6
April - 8
May - 10
June - 1
July - 1
August - 4
September - 5
October - 5
November - 2
December - 0
By Spectrum:
FM - 55
AM/SW - 3

One thing you did not say, butt pirate...several of those busts
were the result of AKC action.


Prove it, felon-boi!

Prove they werent Randy.


George, we've been all over this proof issue before. And again, since
you seem to have forgotten, when someone is called on a claim, it is
the claimant's responsibility to prove it.


dont you remeber what that one assclown used to say it is up to the
accuser to prove him wrong. no one said anything to him when he used to
say that so i figured it was status quo(how things work)


Ok, in that case, I work for the CIA. Prove I don't.