View Single Post
  #35   Report Post  
Old January 6th 05, 04:10 PM
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:06:14 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

For crying out loud, Dave, you scream about "facts" when another tries
to educate you, but when it comes to you, you employ those second set
of rules and double-standards which you have for yourself. Your
fact-finding goes right out the window with all logic and you
hypocritically set forth bull**** like:


"channel 6, which is notorious for harboring


the dregs of society, who regularly run high


power, is all the "evidence" I need, to


determine that the station in question is in fact,
llegal,




See Dave, your personal feelings are not "facts" nor "evidence", but of
interest, is the fact you consider them such.


So you are denying that the majority of the "big radios" on Channel 6
are running any sort of high power? Gee, where do all those guys with
the "long nose Suburbans", with the 4 or 5 alternators use their stuff
then?

It is a fact that when a station over 20 miles away from me gives me
an "S9" signal, they are NOT running legal power, with the rare
exception of the one or two guys I worked who were airborne. This
conclusion is reached through empirical analytical observation, which
is the same thing the FCC does when they first investigate an alleged
"high power" infraction.

I never stated nor implied that I knew exactly how much power they
were running, only that it was easily obvious, through the process of
observation, that it was ILLEGAL.

When you are skilled at radio, you tend to hear other clues which make
it a give away as well. Certain class "C" amp raspy distortions are
dead giveaways.

Now, go find some other thread where you can quote me out of context
again......

It's not my personal feelings, but a logical observation.


Dave
"Sandbagger"