On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:22:22 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
Try again Twist......

Dave

"Sandbagger"


No need. I'm quite pacified with what has been illustrated by
yoursefl,,,lies, denials, double-standards, etc.

They're only lies and double talk to you, since you have trouble
comprehending the meaning of words.


But since you asked so
niceley,,,,
Hell Dave,,, back in 94 you claimed you were a radio technician for
"over 15 years", but to date, still become bewildered when one asks
exactly how you made your "DaveMade M-80 spectrally pure". Of course,
you make the claims, but fail to provide for them as always,,this was
your initiated game, not anyone elses

I have hardly been "bewildered". I told you and everyone else how it
was done. It was done by utilizing a 7805 regulator to create a steady
5V for the bias supply. The 5V was then dropped through a resistor and
applied to the base of each of the 2290 devices. The bias voltage was
limited to .6V by utilizing a forward biased diode on each transistor,
which was placed on top of each "pill" for heat tracking and
stability. It's not rocket science, for someone who knows what they're
doing. You know, I might just take a some pictures of the project and
put them on my website just to squash your incessant babble.


Concerning your lawbreaking activities,
this little gem was written in '98..and if you care to check the thread,
you will see you were indeed speaking of cb and NOT hammie radio. *
"*In the mobile I still
run an amp, but it is a class AB, and it is
driven so that it can develop its maximum
modulation percentage"


I was probably talking to Dennis at the time. I've made no secret that
I used to run illegally in the past. The key phrase is "in the past".
I no longer partake in those activities. I grew up Twist, plain and
simple. Now, when will you?


Of course, we can always look at:


The hustler Trumpet was a good antenna in its
day. Its major limitation was that it was coil
matched, and therefore its power handling
capability was not that high (I ran 300+ watts
though mine, but I doubt if it would take a
KW).

Yep, that was also based on empirical observation and experimentation.
The 70's were good to me.........


Damn Dave,,you weren't licensed back when you had this antenna. Was this
the point in your life when you told people to "buy a bandaid" when they
complained of you bleeding them?

That's probably about right. Are you now suggesting that someone can't
change their habits, or opinions with time? Like a 10 year old kid
who makes farting noises with his armpit will never progress beyond
that? Is someone who smokes 2 packs of cancer sticks a day, destined
to remain a chain smoker, and can never quit?


From N3CVJ's autobiography:
I "crystal up" my Midland and Comstat, to
work on the "new" channels. I also added up
to 27.455 for a little "privacy".
Pick up a D&A Hornet amplifier

Skip had been running
for the last few years. After talking skip
internationally on the freeband channels, on
SSB, I gradually lose interest in skip, and it
become more of a nusance, with S9 or better
noise levels, which block out many of the
weaker locals, which force us to move out of
band to escape.

1984- Sell Yaesu 101 and buy Yaesu FT-757
and President Jackson. Group starts on
26.675 FM. This group will be the last group
until 1993.

Factually accurate. Again, what's your point?

BTW there's a more detailed version of that he

http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj/davehistory.htm


And lastly, since you asked niceley adn politely, egarding your channel
6 visits, you said this last summer:
I can hear more rule

violations after listening to 5 minutes on CB
channel 6 than I can hear in a week's worth of
ham radio

But you go on and spin, er,,I mean lie,,,umm, I mean tell the world how
you haven't visited channel 6 (acknowledged via dozens and dozens of
your posts) since the 70's.

I said that I hadn't USED channel 6 since the 70's. That means talking
on it. That does not preclude an occasional listen when spinning the
dial. Since I have seen no evidence to suggest that the channel isn't
still the "toilet bowl", I don't stay.


You sure love to make issues out of semantics......

Keep trying. I love to watch you jump through hoops.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj