View Single Post
  #69   Report Post  
Old January 7th 05, 03:08 PM
Twistedhed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:16:33 -0500,
(Twistedhed)
wrote:
So you are denying that the majority of the


"big


radios" on Channel 6 are running any sort of


high power?


Apparently, that is a an argument you are having with yourself.

No, you are trying to claim that there are no


illegal operators on 6, based on your rejection


to my claim that what I can hear on almost a


daily basis is in fact illegal.



I claimed nothing of the sort. I claimed only that
your claim is bull****, which it is.
Your personal feelings are not facts, despite how many times you invoke
them as such. Let's look at it again since you still can not grasp it.
You said

`channel 6, which is notorious for harboring


the dregs of society, who regularly run high


power, is all the "evidence" I need, to


determine that the station in question is in fact,
llegal."




Once again, your personal feelings are not facts. That illegal operation
occurs on such a channel was never contested by myself, despite your
deperate attempt at trying to say it was. I merely claimed your ersonal
feelings cited above are in no manner "evidence".
The FCC knows the reputation of channel 6 also, only they have protocol
to determine if someone is breaking the law, not personal feelings they
refer to as "empirical evidence" as you do.
Your personal feelings are not "facts".

No but my trained observations skills can be


considered as strong evidence to the positive.




No,,,it can not. It is personal testimony to be taken into
consideration. It is intangible and can not be entered as evidence, only
supporting testimony. Huge difference where the law is concerned, but
with your demonstrated hate and disdain for the law and your fellow
hammie and cb operators, it's crystal clear you have no clue of the law
that pertains and governs your chosen hobby. You demonstrated this when
you held roger beeps and echo illegal on cb because you "couldn't find a
rule that permitted them".



Yes, that part is my personal opinion.


See what you can learn when you are force fed? At the beginning of this
thread, you claimed it was fact, now, after proper instruction, you
admit it is "personal opinion". Good show.
_
and claiming it is nothing short of empiracle
evidence that illegalities occur is jovial.

That you once again think that you can


somehow claim that these illegal operators do


not exist is ludicrous.



You're unglued, davie, You *need* such a distraction, but sucks for you
I said nothing of the sort. Try again,

You're getting more sloppy and desperate by


the day.......


Dave


"Sandbagger"


N3CVJ


Such intense projection, Dave.
To someone that is so used to looking up at everyone else, like
yourself, it might appear that way. Repeat failures at attempting to
place words in other's mouths to obfuscate your incompetence isn't lost
on anyone, Dave.