View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old January 8th 05, 02:19 AM
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:18:37 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :

From:
(Dave*Hall)
snip
So which is it? If you are denying my claim


that there are illegal stations on channel 6,


then by simple inverse logic, you are claiming


that there are NO illegal stations on channel 6.


That isn't inverse logic, that's illogic invoked by yourself. Once
again, since you are displaying an uncanny sense of self-cornfusion, the
legality of stations on channel 6 was never the issue. The only issue
was the manner in which you claimed you could tell they were illegal.



That's Dave -- he grabs a logical fallacy that sounds good and won't
let go come hell or high water.