View Single Post
  #132   Report Post  
Old January 10th 05, 02:40 PM
Twistedhed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:37:50 -0500,
(Twistedhed)
wrote:
N3CVJ said
The "DX" has nothing to do with the amount of
splatter and the distortion a signal may have.


It has everything to with it. For the amount of times you professed to
having talked skip on the freeband, followed by recent denials of you
talking skip, you should know that on MANY occasion, a signal can be
severely wavering from an S1 to an S9 (for but one of many
examples),,,when that signal is coming in at an S9, the splatter may be
intense if you changed the channel and went one up or down. When that
signal is coming in on a wavering S1, you will hear absolutely nothing
on your next channel. Once again, the wavering is a direct result
of...taa daaa....skip.

Uh... Nooooo. Splatter is the result of a dirty


transmitter,




Bleed,,splatter,,,,you're wrong, ya' know..a dirty transmitter is but
ONE example.............once again you incorrectly claimed that skip
does not affect splatter, and are trying to distance yourself from your
espoiused ignorance only after you have been corrected,
Several educated cbers and hammies have clued you in, but as always, you
aer set in your ways and you DO have the right to remain ignorant,
depite several people providing you the correct information.

and those products show up as a


"comb" of harmonics which decrease in


amplitude as you move farther away in


frequency from the fundamental carrier. If the


fundamental signal is +10db over S9, then


those distortion products will be plainly heard


if they are only 10 db or so down on an


adjacent channel.



You are arguing with yourself, again.
Try this: Your claim of dx has nothing to do with splatter is bull****.
Your claim that ony a dirty transmitter splatters,,is absoulte bull****.


That same splattering station, when he fades


down to an S1 signal, is now so weak, that his
adjacent channel splatter products are now


under the noise threshold of the receiver.


THAT is why you don't hear them.





This is quite simple, really....me: 100% correct..you: 100% wrong.

When it comes to radio theory, you haven't


been correct about a single thing.



....said the self-professed "radio Technician" who has been in radio for
"over twenty years"
and maintains incorrectly that roger beeps and echos are illeal on cb.
'Nuff said,

Dave


"Sandbagger"


N3CVJ