NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, Jan 11, 2005, 6:54am (EST-1)
From: =A0Dave Hall Group: rec.radio.cb
Subject: =A0 How would you improve your CB? Date: =A0=A0 Tue, Jan 11,
2005, 7:54am Organization: =A0=A0 home.ptd.net/~n3cvj X-Trace: =A0=A0
sv3-q7SGue42H/vRaDYH4N3psNg3Qmw/YC9a4Dyd/tW5TMIxcpFlD4+wudF3VPa/NeT9FyEbxV=
riN7HTczS!F65LQgVvtLpIGvjN6QYn9fYhYdfeR1OY+JFqkVzh +LSmz4niczFJLmK8iGPsEdHl=
04Ir/DKOXiRl!a8QIrMaMCPE=3D
X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward a
copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be
unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.22
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:32:19 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:48:36 -0500, n3cvj wrote:
Someday I may clue you in to just how a

psychological study of your posting habits was
included in someone I know's psychology

report on deviant behaviors.

That would be so rich, if you knew who the hell you were responding,

That'll never happen, since you have such a

paranoia about remaining anonymous.

Just can't help yourself,,,lmao.
Only you are concerned with the personal identity

Your identity is who you are.

That you mistake a user name as one's personal identity is your problem.

You said it yourself: "If I only knew who the

hell I was responding too"..... The implication,

of course, is that I would somehow recognize

you as someone I either know, or is someone

of some prestige or notoriety, which

commands some degree of respect.


Not necessarily, but such an implication is valid each time you attempt
to make me your (off) topic.

long as you choose to hide behind your

"cartoon character", we'll never know that, and
you remain an anonymous little twit, who lacks
the guts to come clean.


You were proved a coward, Dave. You had every opportunity to end your
nuances and obsessions concerning your penchant for who I may or may not
be when you mentioned you were coming to Disney and as always, you
disappeared when you were backed into a corner.



BTW, I'm not the one desperately trying to find
out little tidbits of information about other

people on here, like your erroneous claim that

my wife's name was "Kim T. Hall",



Kimberly T. Hall...
,
or who once claimed that you had it on good

authority that I'm a bitter divorced man, or that

I was "abused" by my grandfather at a young

age.

Nope,,,you were the one who initiated the off topic personal garbage and
excused your name calling behavior with "they were personal
observations" and other such bull**** pontifications. Now that the show
is on the other foot and you are on the receiving end of your own
mudslinging, you try to illustrate that such behavior was of my origin,
when it clearly began with you.


For someone who claims to care little about

personal information, you sure make efforts to

find it, even if it is wrong. Just another

example of your hypocrisy, and lies.

Wake up, Dave. Stop being so bitter with everyone involved in your life,
voluntary and otherwise.
Concerning your self-espoused accomplishments concerning the internet,
you sure have a cow over following internet safety protocol, security
experts advice, and basic isp groundrules for the internet. Very telling
is your dwelling on that of which you are not permitted. You're like a
spoiled child that keeps being told "no" over and over and all he can do
is cry about how unfair life is and blame others for his misery.

As opposed to you who, when told "no", just

do it anyway in disregard for the laws of

society?

Yes, exactly like that, because, despite your best attempts at
portraying otherwise, I have not complained here about the rules, unless
my opinion was specifically solicited and in tailored to two very
specific rules regarding dx and certain freqs.


And such is the double edged sword of

remaining anonymous.


Only I'm not anonymous, Dave...only you continue to miscue and assert
such.

If you really are

someone of worthiness, and respect, well

never know it,



The only person that has ever considered you as part of a "we" when
speaking for them is N8WWM. If you can name another, by all means, feel
free to expound...
But, as you know, the people you consider "we" in addition to
yourself, are in no position to judge, despite your self-elevational
status to judge, jury, and executioner.

Borrowing terms from Frank now?


How desperate you appear, Davie. Google "judge and jury" and you will
find I used the term on occasion. The addition of "executioner" fits
aptly (with a nod of acknowledgement to Frank) as you have condemned
many on this group as guilty with nothing more than your declaration of
such based on ignorance and misinformation.


You really are devoid of originality aren't you?
=A0
=A0Such delusions are what has you so angry over being kept so impotent
regarding that of which you are continually denied.

If that were true, it would be laughable.

The day that I let this newsgroup rule my life,

will be the day I leave.

Like the radio, I control what goes on.


And like your actions, are also contradictory and detached to reality.
It has always boiled down to a control issue with you and when you are
denied such control you get rather testy and begin blathering
incoherently about many things of which you have a great deal to learn.


I make you speak. When I'm done, I stop, until
I feel the need to slap your sociopathic self

around again. But you are blinded by your

own elevated sense of self worth to see that,

or be able to make such a judgement as to

who is really "impotent".

You still don't get it. The only time someone is

"impotent" is when they are ignored.



You have demonstrated on many occasion you see the glass as half empty
as opposed to half full. Such pessimistic views are of your nature and
characteristic of who you are. You are not expected to grasp any other
concept relating to the issue other than that of which you are of fixed
mind.


You can't control yourself enough to allow

that. By constantly responding to me, you

have guaranteed that I am anything but

"impotent".



The only thing demonstrated is your inability to apply cognitive
thinking to the issue of which it applies.


and you remain a newsgroup punch-clown,

Davie's feelings are hurt again,

You assume that I have feelings to hurt.

Your anger-laden posts are testament to such. Name calling and insults
are indicative of the last refuge of the incompetent, but hey,,,,you're
not only free to believe otherwise, but practically guaranteed.




You are the "Anti" Doug.

Yes, and you align yourself with him and have defended him on many
occasion.

Doug is more rational than you are.



You become more clear by the day.

All that comes from your fingers is double talk

and obfuscation. At least Doug is consistent,

even if warped.


Calling innocent people felons and criminals, and defending such
behavior as you and he have done on many, many occasion, when each of
you have committed your own share of "crimes" is not only NOT consistent
with logic, but is not consistent with the hammie creed, not consistent
with normal behavior, and not generally not consistent with anything
exccept being an azzhole lid.

It's all part of the fun for me.

It has been illustrated many times you find "fun" through your lying.

I have not lied about anything.

Sure you have, Davie, but you are free to soothe that status-starved
ego..

Your statements to the contrary is not proof,

but rather your desperation.


Your lies have been illustrated so many times, your head begins to
bobble and you babble incoherently.

On the other hand, you are the one who lies.

My fun is exposing you for what you are. By

attempting to place other people on the

defensive, it keeps the spotlight off of your

own transgressions, such as your blatant

disregard for federal law, which you claim, on

one hand, to respect, yet selectively ignore

when it suits you. Another glaring example of

your hypocrisy.


Oh, but your ignorance in holding all who go above the national
manadated speed limit of 70 MPH as a federal criminal is more fun than I
can ever provide this group. Tell the group where you went to college so
the world knows where not to send their kids.

For the record, I never said that I am a

licensed practitioner.

It hasn't prevented you from assuming the position and passing yourself
off as such in this group, as only a physician is qualified to make such
statements as you made...lol.....but of course you aren't a physician
Davie, =A0 "For the record",,,you simply are not qualified to make
judgements reserved for physicians only.

Anyone can make informed observations with

the proper background.

You don't need to be licensed to do it, until

you expect to get paid for it.


You made claims only a physician may first determine. Whether
remuneration is received or not, you are unqualified to make such
statements. Such are reserved ONLY for licensed physicians. Your
personal feelings regarding any qualifications you may or may not
possess, are irrelevant.


_
Such a candidate would never
have the need to foster what they think of themselves in an
unsolicitited and gratuitous manner such as your low self-esteem
dictates.

More double speak?



Nothing redundant in my posts, Davie, except when an issue needs
dissected in order for you to grasp it, Davie,. try to keep up.

It is easily observed that you have assigned a

much greater worth to what I do, than I,

myself, have ever stated. You are the one who
lied about my claiming to be a medical

professional.


Not at all. You were setting forth medical diagnosis' based on what you
were given to digest in a usenet group. Go ahead and expound on this
importance one places on what another says,,,or does.


You are the one who claimed that I am some

sort of master of the internet. I have never

made any such claims. The problem is YOU.

You lie like a rug.



Sure you did, You made several posts claiming how you were a network
admin and all this bull****, then when it was shown you were double
posting through this group, you denied it and had to be shown your
headers were from the college, that you THEN said you "used" to post
through via a "borrowed" (bull****) account.
When these headers were shown to you, you pleaded ignorant of internet
protocol and the like, claiming "I have no idea how such routing works".


I said that I enjoy

studying human psychology from my own

curiosity, as a hobby.



And your Walter Mitty status-starved self has deluded you into fancying
you share the same qualifications. You do not.
Nevertheless, you have permitted yourself to be reduced to fodder by
deluding yourself that you are as qualified as a licensed physician. You
are not.

I am qualified to see the virtually textbook

example of Anti-social personality disorder as

expressed by your actions here.


Actions? You mean these words that you said have no relation to your
life and world? The same words you said you showed (on more than one
occasion) to a colleague outside this group? The same words that you
said you left here when you turned off the internet, just like when you
turn off the radio? Are these the same "actions" that have you running
around like mad, trying to tell anyone, anyone who will listen, that you
really are in control?
Ah yes,,,THOSE actions,,,,


(Now is a good time to once again remind us

how this is only a "cartoon character", and not

who you really are) Uh huh.....



Well, Dave, in keeping with bringing you back o reality, the majority of
internet personalities are not who people "really are". Once again, your
angered resentment is because you ruined your reputation by coming on
here and treating people like a jack ass. If you had enough on the ball,
you would have treated people fairly and not judged them based on their
political views and values, whether you agree or not.

You respond in a

predictable manner, with anticipated

responses to carefully presented stimuli.

No wonder you and N8wwm get along so well. He posts about microchips
implanted in people with "programmed stimuli" and here you are echoing
his tripe.

Funny thing, he's right.


That's not funny, that's twisted of you, Davie.

You can't muster enough self control to not

respond to those "programmed stimuli". You

are like a moth drawn inexplicably to the

flame, which will end up being its demise.


That's an easy statement to make after I have been out here for years,
making a few posts per day, five days per week. You again, demonstrate
your lacking in communications and skill pertaining thereof. Your
attempt at using usenet as some sort of "programmed stimuli" to soothe
your damaged and status-starved ego, illustrates the difficulties
manifested by yourself when proper communications are required. Via
empirical observation and the powers vested in me by you and N8, I
hereby diagnose you as having a character flaw.


That's why we all laugh at you. You are all too

transparent and predictable. When I'm done

with you, I'll stop posting again. But you can't

resist getting in the last word.



Actually, the mere notion that you or N8 laughs at anyone, is all the
comedic relief one needs.

_
Your name calling, badgering of others and your disregard for any view
but your own
makes you the worst example
of a hammie society has to offer.

_
Actually, Dave, your ignorance among that of which you are licensed has
always angered you to the point of fostering your inner demons and
resentment on others.
You create controversy and then feed off of
the attention of others to bolster your own low self esteem. You do what
you want without due concern for the rights of others.




By operating on the freeband, you are neither

a CB'er nor a ham. You are nothing short of a

lawbreaking radio pirate. So what does that

say? Who are you to criticize the operating

habits of others when you have a closet full of

your own "issues"?



I criticized NO ONE at any time in here for their operating habits,
except for those like you and N8, who have falsely attacked many on this
group, through your own ignorance of the law.

More hypocrisy.


Yet, when your picture is presented to you,

"MY" picture? I'm not the one, nor is anyone else in this group OR the
hamme groups, seeing you as qualified as a physician, radio repair
tech,or anything else your dragging self-esteem needs dictate in order
to soothe itself...hehe...this is YOUR "picture" Davie.

One does not need to be a "qualified" anything
to see the obvious.


You have demonstrated not only do you not see the obvious, but have
trouble grasping it.

All one has to do is access the DSM-IV which

is available in many places on the internet,

and look up APD, and then compare the

symptoms with your past behavior (Which is

archived for posterity).


Is this where I should accuse you of paying homage to me for
plagiarizing my first used (n this group) wording of "preserved for
posterity" when speaking of google?
Ah, never mind, I am kind of growing fond of your psychosis which you
chose to share with the world.


The only one in denial is you. But like the old

saying: "When you try to tell a nut that he's

nuts, he'll swear that you're crazy."

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ


Especially when the entire world sees you differently as you see
yourself.