N3CVJ wrote:
A small sampling of examples illustrating your cognitive and
interpretive skills:

What do you consider a good price?

What do you consider a great price?

What do you consider lightning protection?

What do consider a bad swr?

What do you consider legal power?

Just what do you consider tolerance?

What do you consider injuy?

What do you consider a channel?

What do you consider work?

What do you consider proper drive?

What do you consider old?

What do you consider a fact?

What do you consider nice?

What do you consider a positive contribution?

Assuming these are quotes of mine (and

considering you recent past penchant for

confusing another's quote for one of mine, it's

probable that they're not),




Its your fault you can't remember your lies and what you posted.

Twist: "Still have the Phelps, Dave?"

N3CVJ: "WHAT Phelps? I wish I HAD a Stationmaster"


Delving into the archives, you made many posts about having a Phelps
Stationmaster only a few short years ago. Now,,any normally educated
hammie in the world would remember his base stations and antennas, even
as a child. The fact that you had no clue what I referred is roof
positive you lie. A pattern here is you rambling incoherent, being shown
you are wrong, often with your own words, and watching you scramble like
a monkey to "explain away" to the world, just what you really meant.


your overly

simplistic and literal translations fail to account
for the reality that those questions are all

relative or subjective, depending on the

writer's perspective and point of reference. But
I'd guess those concepts are beyond your

reasoning ability.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ

To be fair, your guesses are steeped in ignorance and the refusal to
learn.
Whether your difficulties originate with confusion concerning subjective
or "relative", no one else on the group shares such a dilemma of not
grasping what everyone else means.
Only you seem to suffer with interpretive skills when others use
simplistic terms.
After all, only you express great difficulty interpreting each writer's
perspective, which is why you have to ask everyone what they mean when
they use extremely simplistic terms...your interpretive and
communicative skills are shot and not one other person in the group
suffers from the "reasoning ability" you invoke responsible for your
behavior not comprehending all the writers "perspective" and "point of
reference". Everyone else understands what everyone else means with such
simple terms as ilustrated above..only you have the underlying issues.