RadioBanter - View Single Post

January 14th 05, 04:28 PM

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:39:07 GMT, Lancer wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:03:43 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
Lancer wrote:
OK, but I agreed with that. I said that DX helps the splatter by this:
If he's in Florida talking on a bone stock radio, I won't hear him in
Los Angeles. Now, if he decides to fire up an amp, I still won't hear
him in LA.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Now skip rolls in, I can here him without an amp
and with an amp, but on the adjacent channel, where the noise was zero,
I now have a ton of signals, so the skip didn't help those signals
"bounce into" LA? of course it did. Now the adjacent channel has more
"splatter" than before, skip didn't help enhance the noise level on my
end?
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0La ndshark

Ok, skip increased his signal that you hear.

Exactly,,it "affected it", which is exactly what I and Shark maintained,
to which some took issue with.

and skip also increased his splatter that you

hear.

Again,,,another example of skip affecting the splatter, Touche.

Quit clipping my posts apart to fit your needs.

(That's exactly what he does. He destroys the

original context to make it look like you said

something that you didn't)

Now now Davie,,,,you are once again permitting your lack of personal
control over your emotions dictate your topics again...your lack of
education conerning communication etiquette and skill always manifests
in your posts when you disagree with someone. You never learned how to
debate and attack the topic or subject,,you attack the
poster.....illustrative of your ignorance.
Just for the record, he most certainly ackowldged the realtionship
between skip and splatter.

He's either a clever troll or a someone who is

totally devoid of comprehension abilities.

LOL,,you are the one needing to ask everyone else what they mean when
they use sixth grade terminology on a repeat and ongoing basis.

(I was trying to point

out to Shark that skip will progate the original

signal and the splatter equally.)

Funny,,,,here you are trying to make a point that you apparently think
Shark took issue with,,,,he didn;t,,and neither did I.

Anyone with average intelligence understands
this. But I guess some seem to need the exact
literal finite details colored in or they grasp the

wrong meaning.

Expressed superbly by the illustration of your posting history littered
with redundant questions of "What did you mean by...".
Only you have this difficulty and your posting history shows such,
Projecting your character flaws onto another won't make it so.

But

The relation between his signal and his

splatter doesn't change.

Skip affects splatter.

(No more than the original part of his signal...

Do you think that skip effects the splatter

component of his signal more that the

desirable part of his signal?

and it does not effect the realtionship between

the two.)

Right! The relationship between the

fundamental signal and the splatter

components present will not change with the

variation of the DX conditions. They move

together harmoniously.

Try and get lucid again, if you can muster the courage, Once again, you
aer talking to yourself. No one made such a claim that splatter changes
dx conditions, which is why you taking issue with yourself is such a
gift.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ