On Sun, 23 May 2004 05:57:28 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:
Dear Richard, you are confusing the matter even further, if that were
possible.

Old Son,

Have I stolen your thunder?

Like the pendulum with a dull and meagre swing, your predictable
observations on this subject return to an unremarkable SWR, a topic
never raised without the old wife discovering it under her bed....

Does the following strike a bell?
A QUOTATION:

"When you can measure what you are speaking about and express it in numbers
you know something about it. But when you cannot measure it, when you cannot
express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre and unsatisfactory
kind. It may be the beginning of knowledge but you have scarcely in your
thoughts advanced to the state of science."

You have never offered a scintilla of quantized discussion to the
matter. If you can summon up a respectable treatise that would make
lord kelvinator proud, then maybe we would have something of actual
substance to discuss. We can start with any of a number of my own -
if, of course, you want to advance to the state of science. Forgive
this last bit of presumption if you are simply trolling again. That,
too, has its own entertainment merit and I am glad to correspond in
kind. :-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC