"...intended..."

Here in the US, if you have a small amount of a controlled substance,
they assume you "intend" to sell. Well, if you are transmitting a
radio signal across the county and radiating it through my body, I
assume you "intend" for me to receive it.

Amazing how the powers that be interpret things for their own benefit.

I know we (in the US) are prohibited from all kinds of listening and
rebroadcasting. How do you spell G-e-s-t-a-p-o?

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:32:39 -0400, Al
wrote:

Could you elaborate on your position of legality.
Do you have a statement from Industry Canada?
Perhaps you do. That would be interesting.

My interpretation of:

"Except as prescribed, no person shall intercept and make use of, or
intercept and divulge, any radiocommunication, except as permitted by
the originator of the communication or the person intended by the
originator of the communication to receive it."

is that you are 'intercepting' and 'making use of'.

On 14 Jul 2004 14:43:28 -0700, (Micro) wrote:

Update:
It is infact legal to broadcast the conversations in Canada. The
people that e-mailed me were mistaken.

I guess I got worried about nothing.

So the SCANNER IS BACK UP. ENJOY.

- Jon
http://waterlooscanner.zapto.org

Spammers, please send email to:

and get your SMTP server blacklisted!