"political commentator" wrote:


"Mark Hickey" wrote in message
.. .
(George Herbert Walker) wrote:

Uh huh... pehaps you could tell us all WHY the POTUS would be wearing
a wire at all, and what advantage that might possibly give him. Never
mind the obvious technology issues that has disproven your theory -
tell us all what possible advantage he might gain by wearing a wire to
a debate.

The advantage would be to 'reminded of things'. They could have had
hundreds of things to say to him to cover many possibilities.

It was posted somewhere else that they got the idea to do it from the
speculation in the first debate.

Ummmm, if it was a RECEIVER, it would presumably go to his EAR, right?
If so, routing the wiring outside his shirt, under his tie to... ????
doesn't make a whole lot of sense, does it?

If it was to a speaker hidden in his tie, I fail to see how it could
be loud enough for him to hear it without being picked up by the
(sensitive) microphone(s) at the podium.

Sorry - the whole conspiracy theory thing makes (if it's possible)
LESS sense than the support for the Dan Rather memos.

Mark Hickey
Habanero Cycles
http://www.habcycles.com
Home of the $695 ti frame