Hey as they say in New York -- Foo Get Bout it.

99.99999 Percent of the Shortwave readers here won't even open up a post
like this or they filter them out.

I opened it up just to let you know I never open up Off Topics. Most do
likewise. You are only wasting your time and NG Bandwidth

It is not your cause I object to -- pro or con. But rather IT HAS NOTHING TO
DO WITH SHORTWAVE RADIO (Please read twice)

Please show some consideration and take it else where. Lots of NG's for this
sort of thing. And you will get folks who ARE interested in your cause --
some sympathetic. Here we just don't care and don't want to see it.

But I do object to your graphic descriptions -- they are horrid, not fit for
children, or any one else.
Would you talk to your Grandmother, Mother, Little Sister in this disgusting
manner ???


"NO-FAGS" wrote in message
...
Our culture becomes ever enamored with the gay life style, declaring
Catholic Priests as child molesters rather than gay, lest it tarnish the
gay image, but refusing to document fervid attempts by some in the gay
community to lower the age of consent for adult/child sexual
relationships.
Where is the mention in the mainstream media of NAMBLA, (North American
man
boy love association)?

We now have the first gay bishop in the Episcopalian church, proudly
stating that his homosexuality was a call from God, that his heterosexual
marriage was nullified in the presence of the Eucharist, he therefore knew
that God has had a change of mind, apparently preferring the trends of
mankind to his own eternal ways.

Sorry folks, the idea of one man mounting another man, hairy back and all,
from the rear, then commencing to use his rectum as a sexual organ should
be offensive to all. Folks, we aren't given the visual imagery of a feces
coated penis being casually draped on the sheets after the so called
consummation of the act. We aren't shown (banish the thought) of men
marching in parades, parades that they sue to have the right to march in,
men wearing bras and panties, dressed in almost unimaginable ways. We
aren't told of Gay Days at Disneyland, comprised not of respectable people
enjoying themselves regardless of their sexual preferences, but sick and
deprived people engaging simulated sex acts, engaging in public nudity,
fondling themselves in front of the remainder of the unsuspecting public,
a
public somehow delusional, believing those advertisement spots on TV
advocating that you take your children to Disneyland for some wholesome
fun.

We are shown images of very nice gay guys and women, great neighbors,
concerned about the community, suffering from the outrages of unfounded
bigotry. The problem is that many of us believe this, and are equally
willing to believe that all Christians are zealots, dangerous rightwing
fanatics, rhapsodically reverberating, hands in the air, speaking in
tongues, falling to their knees in prayer.

Who sets these images? The media. Who is saturated beyond belief with
gays?
(no, it's not the Catholic church), The Media!

I seriously doubt that gays comprise more than 2% of the U.S. population.
There are many many more gun owners than gays. Who is represented
favorably
on TV and in the media? Gays. Who is represented as crazed rightwing
extremists with the IQ of a mentally retarded squirrel? Gun owners. Who
do
the politicians coddle to, gays? Who do the politicians screw (some gays,
literally I'm sure) gun owners?

Brought to you by the Northern Office of the Families Against Gay Sex
(NO-
FAGS)