VHF yagi element diameter
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			I've got a design from Wes Stewart (see "Wideband VHF Yagi - Do I have to 
use a folded dipole configuration?" below)  for a 6 element yagi covering 
156-162 Mhz. I'm not sure what is, I mean NBS, OWA.-whatever. (Wes, I'd like 
to know if possible  because then I know what I'm dealing with). 
 
Anyway, DE is 5/16" and parasitic elements are 3/16" in this design. 
 
Now not being an antenna buff I have, regarding the element diameters, the 
following thoughts arise: 
 
1 Better not think about altering any of the element diameters. Advantages: 
Does not run risk of altering design performance.  Disadvantages: If I alter 
diameters then maybe performance will suffer or I'll have to try to engage 
in a bit of designing myself to ensure performance does not suffer from any 
changes.Hey I'm not a designer. 
 
2 Stick with diameters because the element diameters given seem to me to 
make for a lighter antenna with reduced windload.  Why increase element 
diameters (if you don't feel you have to) if there is no performance 
advantage, all you are doing is creating a bulkier antenna. 
 
3 Alter element diameter(s) because of the limitations imposed by the 
materials you can get your hands on.  For instance let's say I can buy a 
commercial dipole center peice that takes 1/2" tube. So, the reasoning is 
alter DE to 1/2", make any adjustments to maintain performance.  And what if 
you could buy commercial fixings that allow you to fix 3/8" tube, you might 
then decide to substiutute 3/8" tube for the 3/16" parasitic elements. 
 
As you can see, all these things go thru my mind after being presented with 
a design, and I get a bit flustered. 
 
You might say that the conserative guy, afraid to risk anything just sticks 
with the original elemment dimentions no matter what. 
 
The give-it-a-go guy says, don't be afraid, if you feel you want to use 1/2" 
for DE, and perhaps 3/8" for the parasiticvs, alter that in the 4nec2 
programme and see what happens.  Or is that going to lead to disaster! The 
changes being too great. 
 
One thing though, I suppose after makling alterations and before 
construction, one could pass the new design through the hands of antenna 
buffs. Dead simple to email the NEC file. 
 
One time most constructors would just be presented with a design and they 
would stick to it no matter what.  Nowadays with these antenna programs 
people who know little (like me) can seek to mess with the design if for 
instance one has some tubing to hand that is not the same diameter as in the 
design. Perhaps that can be gotten away with.  Maybe. 
 
I think there is something to be said for 2. Might mean items are not 
available off the shelf though. 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |