Frank Dresser wrote:
"BlabittyBlahBlah" wrote in message
...

Don't you wish you had a dollar for every time you read a stupid reply to

a

poster's question, like the following typical example?


ORIGINAL POSTER asks something like this:

I am thinking about getting a Blap-O-Matic 99 tabletop receiver. How well

does

this radio perform? Has anyone had any problems with it? Please share your
hands-on experience with your Blap-O-Matic 99. Thanks.



SOME IDIOT posts the following reply:

I don't know anything about the Blap-O-Matic 99, but I do have a Radio

Snatch

XYZ-222, which seems to do a great job for a portable. It eats batteries,
though. I really like the little red signal strength LED.



AAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHHH !!!!!




What? You want to critisize people who try to contribute to a specific
discussion with a possible general comparision, but you don't find a
specific post to critisize?

Frank Dresser


I don't know Frank, I'm having a great day out here in the desert and
my scanner works well, eats batteries but I can recharge it.
The radio reception is great out here. The Sat 800 works well.


Burr
Grundig's Sat800&650,YB400&FR200
Drake SW8 Scanners BC 895&245XLT
Sangean DT110(for Ball Games)
Also Have a Clock Radio!!!
N35.3582
W117.4157
South Left Coast, U.S.A.