Thread
:
patcomm review
View Single Post
#
3
November 9th 03, 12:51 AM
Brian
Posts: n/a
Check QST Feb 98 and Dec 2000 for the PC-1600 Amateur Transceiver.
FWIW, they reviewed the PC-9000 Amateur Transceiver also.
Never seen just the reciever reviewed anywhere.
Brian
(Diverd4777) wrote in message ...
Hi Mike:
- Saw this ad a few years ago; my guess is it's Ex- Grumman
engineers putting this one together...
From the Web site:
"We utilize state of the art technology to provide cost effective solutions to
HF Communications problems"
- Haven't seen any reviews or performance comparisons on it;
Looks like a Very good set!
- Gone missing from all reviews, except some that are in german;
- and one wierd one with strange links..)
( Do a Google Search " Patcomm RX-16000E" )
My guess is that this receiver MIGHT be a .. Well , grumman engineers,
Military..
" YOU KNOW "...
- Like to compare it to an R-75 or some such..
Anyone Know WHY This set's flown under the radar for So Long ??
Dan
http://www.patcommradio.com/webdoc1.htm
In article ,
(Mike Maghakian) writes:
How come I have never seen a review or comment on this receiver:
http://www.patcommradio.com/webdoc6.htm
Reply With Quote