(RHF) wrote in
om:

Read the facts for yourself.

http://cjdfoundation.org/info.html

Summary, there have always been cases of CJD.

In the under 60 year old group, 1 case in a million.
In the over 60 year old group, 5 cases in a million.

Initially three types, Sporadic, Inherited, Infective.

There is a New Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease which is attributed to
BSE contaminated animals.

"There have been over 100 cases of vCJD, most of which have occurred in
the United Kingdom, and the numbers are still rising. A few cases of
vCJD have been found in France, Ireland, Italy, and Hong Kong. Because
the incubation period between exposure to the TSE agent and the onset of
symptoms may be as long as 40 years, it is uncertain whether these vCJD
cases may signal the beginning of an epidemic or whether the incidence
of vCJD will remain low. At the present time, no vCJD has been
discovered in the United States."

Being that the latency period is as much as 40 years, the extent of the
harm of the 36,000 confirmed cases in one year of BSE (infected cows) in
England in terms of causing vCJD in humans may not be known for a number
of years yet.

Overall, I'd say they globalists have their way of reducing the
population. Though an average of 40 years incubation period won't be of
much concern to the 40 year olds and older, imagine the loss of your
Grandchildren when they are 40. This is truly disgusting.

Supposedly Jacques Cousteau believed in annihilating the world's
population to save the natural beauty of the planet and to remove man's
meddling influence. Don't believe me? Search Google for this "must
eliminate 350,000 people per day" quotes and all.

He certainly wasn't a Godly man. If there is no God, what is the purpose
of preserving the earth anyway? One day, the sun will expand, and all
life on earth will be obliterated. So a billion years of natural bliss
will be extinguished "by" nature. This is the problem with the
separation of man from God. Jacques Cousteau believes that insuring
nature a period of existence free from humans is the noble thing to do.
But what if, through man's meddling influence, and his pollution causing
space flights, man is successful at saving the world, perhaps destroying
an asteroid far out in space, or at least, deviating it's path
sufficiently to allow it to miss earth. In this case, meddling mankind
would actually assure the continued existence of the animal kingdom. No,
Jacques doesn't consider this.

My question is, of the people that actually advocate a significant
reduction in the population, why don't they take the first step and
commit suicide? No, their aspirations are always for someone else to go.

Happy Chanukah and Happy New Year.

Dr. Artaud





--
To know and to be, this is not even a question, there is no alternative.
You see it clearly in the loneliest little avenues between particles and
waves, shunned even by the gregarious quark and unknown by the various
strands of time, so big it cannot be seen, yet so little it is
immovable, lies the fabric of the ultimate reality gripped in the tiny
fist of the all or nothing."