RadioBanter - View Single Post

December 29th 03, 12:24 AM

ojunk (Michael Bryant) wrote in message ...
From: (Brian)

So in the end, no matter who they are, they're pretty free with the
money as long as its not coming out of their own pockets.

Well, I guess you don't like labor unions. Is that why you think it's good for
Bush to send US jobs overseas?

I didn't see that in the Wash. Post article.

So, YOUR complaint is that labor unions are spending their members' money to
protest outsourcing?

I just asked why labor unions don't do some hiring and do for
themselves all the lobbying against outsourcing instead of outsourcing
everything and complaining about outsourcing.

So you grant that Bush is sending US jobs overseas, right?

No, I didn't see anything in the Wash. Post article validating Bush
sending phone calls over to India.

I'll be honest, sir - your reply is one of the worst attempts I've ever seen at
refutation by attempting to shift the focus of an argument.

Oh, so sorry. Had the Wash. Post article you linked us to included
any validation of your assertion that Bush outsourced phone calls to
India, I would have commented on it. But it didn't.

Let me know when you can actually refute any of the data about Bush
deliberately supporting sending US jobs abroad.

I only had time to look at one of your links. Unfortunately, I don't
have unlimited time to follow all of your links, so I would suggest in
the future that you be more specific before wasting everyones time
with useless, vector links. I.E., get to the point sooner.

But what I did find was that the fed-union appears to do a lot of
outsourcing themselves. Doesn't matter because its someone else's
money, I guess.

I guess that you and I can process identical information and see
different outcomes. Wonder what that means?