"john" wrote in
news:0pWMb.44127$5V2.62848@attbi_s53:

I had the DX-394 and it seemed like a laudable radio.

No offense to the original poster.

My purpose in responding, after reading a great deal of informative
responses to your query, is to chide all of those that responded by
leaving your entire post intact. As much as some of you people wail about
wasted bandwidth and the need to expunge political posts since they
consume bandwidth, so many of you reposted his entire post without need.
One or two people responded issue by issue, justifying the entire post
for context. Otherwise the thread was a ludicrously long one.

I have killfiled this thread, as I do so many of the threads that I
start, since recriminations are pointless, most of you won't change from
the ideas proffered in my posts and I won't likely change from the ideas
in your posts.

Dr. Artaud

Hi guys and gals. Pretty new to shortwave and I know its late to be
asking but how many of you use a DX-394 communications receiver and
what do you think about it?

--
To know and to be, this is not even a question, there is no alternative.
You see it clearly in the loneliest little avenues between particles and
waves, shunned even by the gregarious quark and unknown by the various
strands of time, so big it cannot be seen, yet so little it is immovable,
lies the fabric of the ultimate reality gripped in the tiny fist of the
all or nothing."