On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:14:36 GMT, wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 17:34:41 -0800, "CW"
wrote:


"George Blomfield" wrote in message
news:4009e0e0.2462200@news-server...

Open the Winradio, and marvel at the beautiful subminiature components
surface-mounted on both sides of several densely-packed multilayer
boards, meticulous craftsmanship, and not a single adjustable
component in sight.

Yes, most disposables are made that way.
Very astute observation. :-)

A rather uninformed observation, considering the state-of-the-art of
radio engineering in the year 2004, and a world of difference between
the levels of craftsmanship applied to these two products which is
obvious to anyone who actually bothers to look at the products before
making such observations... :-)

The Winradio has never been professionally reviewed. The IP3 sucks...
as do the rest of the published specs. Way way overpriced.

Not sure what you mean by "never professionally reviewed". Read the
current (2004) issue of WRTH. Is this professional enough? And the
other numerous reviews including one in Short Wave Magazine (also
available on http://www.winradio.com/home/g303i-reviews.htm)?

Problem is that no one makes a decent affordable SW receiver.
It isn't rocket science and this is 2004 isn't it?

I'd suggest that you look at Winradio G303i first, and *then* talk
about rocket science in 2004... ;-) Nothing comes close. Try it for
yourself, you'll see... :-)

George