View Single Post
  #2   Report Post  
Old January 25th 04, 04:37 AM
RHF
 
Posts: n/a
Default

= = = ojunk (Michael Bryant)
= = = wrote in message ...
From:
(RHF)

But, there has to be a certain amount of natural discourse in
any group for it to be Alive and Interesting for the 85% of
the Members who simply Read-the-Mail.


I will stand by my belief that what the SAT800 group turned into was far more
annoying than "natural discourse." There just wern't many posts being made
about the SAT800. Remeber, it operated as a mail list and all that crap was
overwhelming to wade through.

However, I am sorry to admit that about every ten days.
I have to DELETE a 'posted' Message and REMOVE-BAN a Member.
Plus File an ABUSE Report with YAHOO Groups about the Member.
NOTE: Not something I 'like' doing; but it is something that
"Has-to-be-Done" to maintain order and establish control for
the benefit of the group.


When was the last time you did that to someone requesting that the group try to
stay on-topic, RH? I'll bet never. Which makes me wonder why you've been so
vehement in defending JJ's actions. I think anyone that tries can figure out
why you seem so involved.


MWB, Did I Defend "JJs" Actions NO [.]
[ "JJ" is able to Speak for Himself. ]
I Simply Stated How I Manage the eGroups on YAHOO!
For which I am 'personally' Responsible to the Membership.


After all in my former life, when
I had a JOB; I was a "Inspektor Gruppe Führer" for more than
20 of those 32 Years. free-at-last, Free-At-Last. FREE-AT-LAST !


There you go down that memory lane, again, RHF. ;-


MWB, Be Thankful for your Memories: Some Day they will simply
start to fade away and your life will begin to change forever.


Do me a favor and let it go, RHF. I'm trying to do the same. If you really
believe that JJ did the acceptable thing, fine. We'll just have to agree to
disagree. Neither one of us will change the other's mind.

Mike

..