Lenof21 wrote:
In article .com,
writes:
Of course it's also possible that Len has gotten so desperate for
attention that he's intentionally posting untrue things (like the
legality of operating with an expired license mistake) just to get a
response.
"Desperately?!?"
No, Len. "Desperate".
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHEHEHEHEHEHEH.
Excuse me, yer lordship, lost control there... Bwhaha...oops.
We'll wait while you go freshen up, Len. ;-)
You do appear to be desperate for attention.
After all, how does it affect *him* if some ham reads his
words, thinks they're true, and operates illegally?
HAMS rule amateur radio.
You seem to think so, but you're mistaken. Just as you are mistaken
about the legality of FCC-licensed radio amateurs operating amateur
radio stations while their amateur radio licenses are expired but in
the grace period.
FCC doesn't require commissioners or staff to hold amateur radio
licenses in order to regulate U.S. amateur radio.
That's true. Those people *are* required to have other qualifications,
though, and to be appointed to their positions.
You're neither a radio amateur nor part of the FCC. And you never have
been, Len. You don't have the qualifications to be either.
Ergo, J.P. logic has it that NO HAM SHOULD OBEY THE FCC
IF THEY DON'T HAVE HAM LICENSES!
Nope. Nowhere do I say that. You're simply mistaken, Len.
What I will say is that *you* do not "rule amateur radio", Len.