On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 00:23:44 GMT, "Frank Dresser"
wrote:


"Tracy" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 23:26:02 GMT, "Frank Dresser"
wrote:



Why have you singled out Brenda Ann for an attack then?

Her comments. If you question morality then expect to be questioned
yourself. I made one post asking her to look at herself if she were
going to question morality.

Is she the first person you've noticed here questioning anyone's
morality? Or is she the only one you think is immoral?


Has she done anything to do anyone else any harm?

I would not know!

If you don't know she's done anyone any harm, how immoral could she be?



Is she less moral than those on this group than those who post hard
core
porn links, or take the Lord's name in vain?

In my opinion, yes!

Her website isn't pornographic. She isn't a blasphemer. There's no
evidence she's done anyone any harm. She's contributed to this group in
a positive way.




Do you disagree with Brenda Ann when she says that a lack of morality
is
a major problem in the world today?

No! I think that she and her type are the root of the problem.

Wait a minute. Are you saying transsexuals are the root of all evil?

That is
why I question her. I not a person to judge. No of us are. But, if you
judge, then expect to be judged.

You've judged a helpful person who has caused no one any harm as
immoral.


As I stated earlier, It's not so much the sex change, it's the fact
that she became a lesbian afterwards. At that point, I think that
medical reasoning went out the window and perversion came in the door.
If she felt that she was a female inside why not just get yourself a
man? Why become a woman and then get another woman?

Why let it bother you?

Frank Dresser

See, I made my point earlier, we disagree. That in itself does not
bother me. It's the fact that she questions morals when her closet is
full of skeletons. No, I'm not say that transsexuals are the root of
all evil. I'm saying that she is at the root of the morality issue
that she is complaining about.

Tracy