"Tony Meloche" wrote in message
...


Frank Dresser wrote:

"Fred" wrote in message
news
Yes, it is a nice looking Hallicrafters SX-100, but these are
pretty
common. Why are people paying this much for a very common radion.



http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...ategory=46 73


Confused

This was an expensive radio when new. Probably about $300.
According
to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' inflation calculator at:

http://www.bls.gov/cpi/

That $300 1957 cost is like $1977 today. That certainly doesn't mean
the
radio is really worth almost 2 grand, but it does indicate that
owning a
nice SX-100 is less of a sacrifice than it was 47 years ago.

I have no doubt the high bidder bought the radio to show it off.
Doing
a really nice fixup on a radio can take hours and hours of labor.
And
it may never look quite original to a sharp observer.

I wouldn't pay that much. But I like to fix up old radios, and I
can
sure understand somebody paying extra for a nice one, instead of
trying
to make a nice one out of a cheap one.

Frank Dresser


I can relate to this. My first SW capable radio was a 1937
Zenith -
a console with "Magic Eye", all band reception, etc. I wouldn't mind
one bit having that radio back today if I could get it back with a
complete cap job, all new tubes, realignment, etc. Regardless of
antenna, it couldn't match a modern high-end
SW reciever, but it would still be fun - the thing reeked of the
"romance" of SW listening back at that time in history.

Tony


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via
Encryption =---