RC,

The prior post to mine in this thread was a reference to the EH Antenna.

Yes I have an 'ego' and apparently your have an "EGO" too.

Hey, I try to be helpful and keep things positive.

I did not play Twenty Questions : I posted three.

I then provided Eight Links to more EH Antenna Information.
[ Not Six Links. ]

I also posted Eight Links related to the prior poster's
Screen Name: "JohnJacobJingleHimerSchmidt" {JJJHS}
[ It's called relating to people / a side-bar. ]

You have the tendency to state you opinions as facts; and
thereby discount all other opinions.

For some the EH Antenna may be a matter of 'faith' and to the
extent that it "Works" in some form or fashion: Hey It WORKS !
Your technical details valid or not, have very little relevance
to them and 'their' EH Antenna.

So Say I - My Opinions Stated as Facts ~ RHF
..
..
= = = Richard Clark wrote in message
= = = . ..
On 5 Jul 2004 18:12:09 -0700, (RHF) wrote:

RC,

Instead of playing the 'game' of posting a reply to anything I post.

Your ego is showing.

Why don't you be helpful to the original poster and attempt
to answer his question.

Like you? ;-)

Instead of playing twenty questions:
First - What type (name) antenna is he talking about ?
Second - What is your 'expert' opinion about this antenna ?
Third - What are the technical aspects of this antenna ?
Let's all note that it was your introduction of 6 off-topic links to
an antenna who I have already responded to against these same three
preceding questions.

Hi OM,

The eh and their ilk are on every sucker list on the web. It is a
simple matter to NOT cross post your responses if they don't shine
under examination. It is also a simply matter to either stay
on-topic, or to at least follow your own side-thread.

Respond to the technical issue, or learn to unlink your posts.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC