Michael 'I must be on drugs, I can't read' Bryant wrote:

Steve Lare,

You suggested I was on drugs for suggesting that you said you were involved in
the search for Pol Pot. Then how do you explain the dollowing archived post:
__________________________________________________ ___________
From: N8KDV )
Subject: "I always had this dream of seeing him in an orange prisoners jump
suit
View: Complete Thread (6 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: 2003-03-08 18:42:11 PST


Nobody You Know wrote:

wrote:



BBC is mute on this..
anyone else pick up anything...?


http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/w...den030307.html



No wonder we can't catch him, our blabbermouth news media keeps tipping him
off.

It's just a matter of time. It's difficult. I spent some time looking for Pol
Pot...never got him... that's the way it happens. This time though...
technology may trip up Mr. Bin Laden... I have my fingers crossed.
__________________________________________________ ______________

Short-term memory loss, Steve? Anyone can check out Google. Took me 60 seconds
to find the post.

Good for you fat boy. Now, let's deal with the facts. Here are your original posts:

"It's hilarious how you amuse yourself in such a stupid. Learn that in the
military. I mean you certainly had a lot of time on your hands while listening
to Pol Pot, right?"

And...

"You claimed, earlier, that you were invloved in efforts to monitor Pol Pot when
you were in the military. Going to deny thay, now? If I produce the original
post will you go away?"

Here was my response:

"I'm waiting fat boy, produce the post that said I was 'listening' to Pol Pot. I
was not 'listening to', nor was I involved in 'monitoring' Pol Pot".

Now as you can see I responded to your posts in an honest way.

You on the other hand cannot read nor comprehend. Do you see your error? No?

Well it's obvious that you do not understand the difference between the words
'looking for' and 'listening to' and 'monitoring'.

You claimed I was 'listening to'... and I denied that. You claimed I was
'monitoring'... and I denied that.

You have deluded yourself into thinking you've produced something. You have not!

Please stop your shuck-and-jive.