FLIPPER,

"Now EQ is something a bit more useful..."

Yes, the "EQ" mite be a bit more useful
.... but you have failed to 'indentify' or Define "EQ".

es ~ RHF
..
..
= = = "flipper" wrote in message
= = = et...

Excellent RHF! It is nice to know that intelligent life exists in
this newsgroup, I was really beginning to wonder. I knew this wasn't
the most progressive lot in the world but I've been a bit taken back
by the scope of ignorance I've encountered.
I don't know what the number of your IQ is but it is higher than
mine - I missed 2 questions. Congrats on your accomplishment! I hope
it provided a few minutes of entertainment for you.
God Bless,
Melvin


Begging your pardon, Melvin, but how does publishing an "IQ test" without a
key to score it by constitute progressive discourse? Rather seems a bit
regressive to me. But then IQ is a funny critter that's over-rated anyway,
at least in the common mythology.

For example, animals like porpoises, pigs, horses, monkeys, dogs, et al,
have measurable IQ's, that are, granted, lower than that of "normal"
(another funny concept) human beings. However, these high IQ beings known as
humans are actively destroying the planet on which we live whereas the other
animals are not. So much for IQ...

Now EQ is something a bit more useful but I'm not aware of an inventory that
assesses it. I'd be curious to know if there is such a yardstick. 73 and
good DX.

Paul


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.637 / Virus Database: 408 - Release Date: 3/20/04