"RHF" wrote in message
om...
= = = "T. Early" wrote in message
= = = ...
"RHF" wrote in message
m...
FW,

"a female interviewer was talking to Ralph Nadar and trying to
get him to admit he'd thrown the election to Bush in 2000,"

ONE MORE DEMOCRAT LIE:

Ralph Nader was NOT the difference (Numerically) in any state
between Bush and Gore when you subtract out Pat Buchanan.
[ The Negatives (RN) balanced out the Pluses (PB). ]

However, Pat Buchanan DID 'make' the "Difference Numerically"
in three states.
[ To put them in the Gore (Won) Column and the Bush (Lost)
Box. ]

Just the Facts ~ RHF

Sorry RHF--Nader got about 97,000 votes in Florida, Buchanan about
17,000. Gotta be fair.

TE,

I was not talking about Florida

Bush = 2,912,790
Gore = 2,912,253
DELTA = 537
Buchanan = 17,484
Had Pat Buchanan not been in
the 2000 Presidential Election
Florida would have went for BUSH - Big Time !
http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2000/2000presge.htm


OK, then I don't understand what you mean by this I guess: "Ralph
Nadir was NOT the difference (Numerically) in any state between Bush
and Gore when you subtract out Pat Buchanan."

When you take Buchanan out of the mix (or even give his votes to Bush)
Nader was the difference in Florida and New Hampshire. If you assume
most Nader votes go to Gore, Gore wins Florida and New Hampshire.